- From: oyvind-stenhaug via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 10:02:39 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
It sounds like @gsnedders and I are on the same page. I must admit that I initially didn't even look at the `<function-token>` and `<ident-token>` references, I just assumed that `<ident-token>` couldn't possibly allow a leading parenthesis, so since my string didn't contain any `)`, how could it possibly match the grammar? Seems to me that `parse a selector` might be better off not referring to a grammar, but to some description of the actual algorithm. I haven't been following along in the goings-on here, but browsing throught the EDs now I don't really understand why Selectors has this grammar, and not a parser algorithm à la Syntax. -- GitHub Notification of comment by oyvind-stenhaug Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/492#issuecomment-247563922 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 16 September 2016 10:02:48 UTC