W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > September 2016

[csswg-drafts] [css-tables] Overconstrained fixed table layout: tests & questions

From: Greg Whitworth via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 17:38:21 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issues.opened-176972023-1473874693-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
gregwhitworth has just created a new issue for 
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts:

== [css-tables] Overconstrained fixed table layout: tests & questions 
==
Opening this on behalf of Gérard

> 
> Greg, François,
> 
> Just in case you are not aware of this.
> 
> [CSS21] Overconstrained fixed table layout 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jan/0093.html
> 
> Re: [CSS21] Overconstrained fixed table layout 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jan/0094.html
> 
> Re: [CSS21] Overconstrained fixed table layout 
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2013Jan/0189.html
> 
> Can the computed width of a cell be negative and, if so, what would 
that imply overall? Or is this question outside the realm of the CSS3 
table spec?
> 
> - - - - - -
> 
> 
http://www.gtalbot.org/BrowserBugsSection/css21testsuite/border-spacing-percentage-cell-001.html
> How wide should be the navy rectangle: 200px or 400px?
> 
> IE11: 200px
> Firefox 48: 400px
> Chrome 53: 200px
> Edge: 200px
> Opera 12.16: 200px
> 
> Gérard


Please view or discuss this issue at 
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/485 using your GitHub 
account
Received on Wednesday, 14 September 2016 17:38:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:41:03 UTC