- From: Florian Rivoal via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2016 07:11:45 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> Do you think this is a common pattern to have initial letter with ruby? No, I don't. I've made some brief research on this topic, and hardly anything turned up. To me, it means we can pick whatever is simpler to interoperably implement, without worrying too much about the use case, as it is a fringe one. I still think we should get rid of ambiguities in the spec. Ideally, I'd like to define a single normative behavior. If we cannot easily agree on what the behavior should be, I could live with explicitly stating this is undefined, but I would prefer not leaving the spec in a state that leaves you scratching your head wondering if it is defining it or or. -- GitHub Notification of comment by frivoal Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/654#issuecomment-256852256 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 28 October 2016 07:11:51 UTC