- From: SelenIT via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2016 06:31:17 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
SelenIT has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == [css-backgrounds] Clarify how `border-width` and `border-style` affect `border-image` == There is a confusion about how `border-width` and `border-style` should affect `border-image` (and should they). In the [example](http://codepen.io/SelenIT/details/yaAKPZ/) of border-image with nonzero `border-image-width` combined with either `border-width:0` or `border-style:none`, browsers behave differently. Firefox and IE11 renders border-image in all these situation, Edge 14 — only if `border-style` is not `none`, iOS 10 Safari — only if `border-width` is not `0`, and Chrome requires both to render it. It seems to be a popular assumption that `border-style` _should_ override `border-image` (e.g. see the note 1 on the [caniuse.com page](http://caniuse.com/#feat=border-image) for `border-image`). However, the current spec clearly says that `border-style` and its sub-components "set the style of the border, *unless there is a border image",* implying that `border-style` shouldn't affect `border-image` if its own sub-components values allow it to be rendered. The test suite for this section (especially tests [border-image-width-005](https://test.csswg.org/harness/test/css-backgrounds-3_dev/spec/css-backgrounds-3/section/6.3/alpha/border-image-width-005/), [border-image-width-006](https://test.csswg.org/harness/test/css-backgrounds-3_dev/spec/css-backgrounds-3/section/6.3/alpha/border-image-width-006/), and [border-image-width-007](https://test.csswg.org/harness/test/css-backgrounds-3_dev/spec/css-backgrounds-3/section/6.3/alpha/border-image-width-007/)) marks the current behavior of Firefox (i.e. ignoring both `border-style:none`and `border-width:0` if there is valid `border-image` with explicit non-zero `border-image-width`) as correct. But there seems to be a bit of ambiguity in the spec in relation to `border-width`. [The section](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-backgrounds-3/#the-border-width) for this property has the following remark: > When the used width of the border is 0, we say that _the border is absent._ And there is no clarification if it is about just "regular" border or about image border, too. Should we add such clarification? Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/655 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 27 October 2016 06:31:23 UTC