Re: [csswg-drafts] [selectors-4] should the >> syntax for the descendant combinator still exist?

The `>>` syntax also serves the purpose of clarification. `a >> b` is 
more explicit than `a b`.


GitHub Notification of comment by SebastianZ
Please view or discuss this issue at 
using your GitHub account

Received on Tuesday, 25 October 2016 06:26:29 UTC