W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > October 2016

Re: [csswg-drafts] [selectors-4] should the >> syntax for the descendant combinator still exist?

From: Sebastian Zartner via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2016 06:25:05 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-255947636-1477376703-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
The `>>` syntax also serves the purpose of clarification. `a >> b` is 
more explicit than `a b`.

Sebastian

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by SebastianZ
Please view or discuss this issue at 
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/641#issuecomment-255947636 
using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 25 October 2016 06:26:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:41:04 UTC