- From: Florian Rivoal via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2016 02:55:54 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> I don't think "children of editable elements" is the right phrasing, since it should apply to deeper descendants too. You're right. Consider this a typo / mis-speaking. I did intend descendants, not children. That said, having though about it some more, since descendants of editable elements are themselves editable in the general case (and if they're not, for example when contenteditable=false has been applied on them directly, they probably shouldn't get spelling or grammar error markers either), what we're looking for is probably applying to editable / user-alterable elements only, without consideration for ancestry. I.e. `:read-write::spelling-error` and rather `:read-write ::spelling-error` > I think browsers could still determine on their own if losing focus means that an element is no longer editable at that moment. That sounds fair to me. -- GitHub Notification of comment by frivoal Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/623#issuecomment-255281709 using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 21 October 2016 02:56:02 UTC