Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-syntax] '>>' and '>>>' should be a token

I'd prefer not to add more Selectors-specific tokens unless necessary;
 they can theoretically make things complicated in the future.

That said, the original Selectors-specific tokens were added so that 
the Selectors grammar was LR(1) (that is, just based on the next token
 to be consumed, no additional "lookahead" at all).  If we want to 
maintain that invariant, we will have to add `>>` and `>>>` tokens.  
If we don't care about that invariant (and are okay with expanding 
Selectors to an LR(3) language - CSS in general is LR(4) iiuc), then 
we can avoid doing this, and drop the other special Selectors tokens, 

GitHub Notification of comment by tabatkins
Please view or discuss this issue at 
using your GitHub account

Received on Monday, 28 November 2016 19:38:04 UTC