- From: fantasai via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 24 Nov 2016 08:48:18 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
To follow up on what Mats is saying (though I'm not 100% sure if the concepts are all connected up correctly), I do think that the stretching effectively overrides the automatic minimum. If the track is auto-sized, then stretching would not decrease below the automatic minimum. If the track is not auto-sized, then the automatic minimum is clamped to the size of the grid area; and that clamping should be limiting any transferred size affecting the other axis as well. Let me know if that made sense or if I should try logicking again when it's not 3am. :) -- GitHub Notification of comment by fantasai Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/283#issuecomment-262721045 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 24 November 2016 08:48:24 UTC