- From: Rachel Andrew via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2016 11:25:23 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
rachelandrew has just created a new issue for https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts: == [css-align][css-flexbox][css-grid] Difference between overflow behaviour when aligning and justifying to start and end in flexbox and grid == Where a flex or grid container is smaller than the items inside, and has overflow auto or scroll set on it, items aligned/justified to `end` or `flex-end` behave differently to those aligned `start` or `flex-start`. The original post from an author who asked me the question is [here](https://github.com/rachelandrew/cssgrid-ama/issues/7#issue-189424032). I did a couple of tests [here](http://codepen.io/rachelandrew/pen/MbmOXO), and found the same behaviour in grid with justify-content at least. This seems to relate to [this open Chrome issue](https://bugs.chromium.org/p/chromium/issues/detail?id=503483), although the behaviour is the same in Firefox. The relevant part of the spec is [here](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-align/#overflow-scroll-position), so the scrolling to the end of the container seems correct, but I think that most authors would expect the overflow to scroll, just from the other direction. I'm not clear from the spec whether this is a bug in implementations, or is desired behaviour for a reason I don't fully understand, either way it could be clarified perhaps with an example (which I'd be happy to put together once I understand the issue fully myself!) Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/751 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 23 November 2016 11:25:30 UTC