W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > November 2016

Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-text-decor] Should text-decoration-skip applied on overline and line-through?

From: Koji Ishii via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 18 Nov 2016 08:36:25 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-261476939-1479458184-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Ok, let's try to summary possible options to solve 

1. **Not to fix.** Just heard from a Latin native that skipping ink 
for strikethrough is quite natural. I don't have a good sense to 
assert this as a non-native, if we can reach consensus that this is a 
common understanding and commonly seen typographic tradition, this may
 not be an issue.
2. **Change `text-decoration-skip` to non-inherited, propagated 
property.** This has pros/cons as in [comment 
3. **Change `text-decoration-skip: ink` only applicable to 
underlines/overlines.** drott@ commented this will limit when authors 
want to skip-ink strikethrough. WebKit does this in its prefixed 
4. **A separate property for skip ink.** We can then make it to 
propagate, or have values for each line types. Blink/WebKit doesn't 
implement propagation well yet, so relying on propagation isn't easy 
at this moment.

Did I list all what were discussed?

GitHub Notification of comment by kojiishi
Please view or discuss this issue at 
using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 18 November 2016 08:36:31 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:41:05 UTC