W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > November 2016

Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-tables] How replaced elements are handled when receiving a table-* display type

From: L. David Baron via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 23:45:55 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-260081736-1478907954-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
It might be preferable to use a **should not** rather than a **must 
not** for the author requirement; I think we've shied away from using 
**must**-level requirements on authors, since we know they're not 
actually going to be honored.

I think the "like if they never had any other display time" is 
ambiguous as to which "other" it's referring to:  does it mean the 
<code>table-*</code> type or its <code>inline</code> or 
<code>block</code> replacement.

I'm curious if you have data on how well this matches existing 
implementations.  (E.g., do they follow this block/inline distinction,
 and do they follow these rules for anonymous box generation and 
whitespace collapsing?)

-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by dbaron
Please view or discuss this issue at 
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/508#issuecomment-260081736 
using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 11 November 2016 23:46:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:41:05 UTC