W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > November 2016

Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-tables] How replaced elements are handled when receiving a table-* display type

From: L. David Baron via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 11 Nov 2016 23:45:55 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-260081736-1478907954-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
It might be preferable to use a **should not** rather than a **must 
not** for the author requirement; I think we've shied away from using 
**must**-level requirements on authors, since we know they're not 
actually going to be honored.

I think the "like if they never had any other display time" is 
ambiguous as to which "other" it's referring to:  does it mean the 
<code>table-*</code> type or its <code>inline</code> or 
<code>block</code> replacement.

I'm curious if you have data on how well this matches existing 
implementations.  (E.g., do they follow this block/inline distinction,
 and do they follow these rules for anonymous box generation and 
whitespace collapsing?)

GitHub Notification of comment by dbaron
Please view or discuss this issue at 
using your GitHub account
Received on Friday, 11 November 2016 23:46:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:41:05 UTC