W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > June 2016

Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-omview] Fix #159. Do not leak a closed node via offsetParent

From: Takayoshi Kochi via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Thu, 09 Jun 2016 07:04:49 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-224816336-1465455888-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Hmm, can it be "unclosed element", just use "unclosed" as an 
adjective?

And in that case we need to add "unclosed element" in the glossary 
definition in the shadow dom spec as well in addition to "unclosed 
node"?


-- 
GitHub Notification of comment by TakayoshiKochi
Please view or discuss this issue at 
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/pull/169#issuecomment-224816336 
using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 9 June 2016 07:04:51 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 19 October 2021 01:30:20 UTC