- From: Christoph Päper via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 18:54:16 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Oh, I only checked [css-fonts-3](https://drafts.csswg.org/css-fonts-3/) briefly and thus missed that `font-palette` and `@palette-entries` are already drafted for level 4, also didn’t see the [original full proposal](https://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-style/2015Feb/0211.html). Thanks for the heads-up, @svgeesus. I think I agree with the chosen solution for font-defined palettes, but I believe there should be a simple way to get monochrome glyphs using only `currentcolor` or shades thereof, which seems more appropriate for the vector variants, `COLR` and `SVG `, than for bitmap `CBDT`. My `font-color: <color>+` was intended to either make a user-defined palette or populate `--color1` etc. easily and @AmeliaBR is right, I hadn’t thought through the exact meaning of `auto`. Nevertheless, my point regarding `text-transform[-variant]` stands and I think the expected results are as shown in the table below. | U+2661 | U+2665 | U+2764 | U+1F499 | U+1F5A4 -----------------|------------------|------------------|------------------|-------------------|------------------- Name | White Heart Suit | Black Heart Suit | Heavy Black Heart| Blue Heart | Black Heart (UC9) default, `none` | ♡ | ♥ | ❤ | 💙 | 🖤 VS15 or `text` | ♡︎ | ♥︎ | ❤︎ | 💙︎ | 🖤︎ VS16 or `emoji` | ♡️ | ♥️ | ❤️ | 💙️ | 🖤️ VS15 and `emoji` | ♡ | ♥️ | ❤️ | 💙️ | 🖤️ VS16 and `text` | ♡︎ | ♥︎ | ❤︎ | 💙︎ | 🖤︎ `emoji` and `monochrome` | ♡ | 🖤️ | 🖤️ | 🖤️ | 🖤️ `text` and `monochrome` | ♡︎ | ♥︎ | ❤︎ | 🖤︎ | 🖤︎ -- GitHub Notification of comment by Crissov Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/352#issuecomment-235990501 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 28 July 2016 18:54:23 UTC