- From: Brad Kemper via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 00:00:15 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
We didn't actually resolve on the parentheses-less color-mod part, but I didn't hear anything against it when I mentioned it. I hope that can go into the next editors draft too. Also no clear resolution on if we want e.g. `rgba(<r>, <g>, <b>)` and `rgb(<r>, <g>, <b>, <a>)` (probably not?), but we do want `rgb(<r> <g> <b> / <a>)`. I don't care about `rgba(<r> <g> <b> / <a>)`, if that's included in the resolution or not. I'd prefer to only back-port to the non-a functions, since the `/<a>` would be available in rgb(). -- GitHub Notification of comment by bradkemper Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/266#issuecomment-235758066 using your GitHub account
Received on Thursday, 28 July 2016 00:00:26 UTC