W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > July 2016

Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-page] <page-size> Keywords

From: Christoph Päper via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 20 Jul 2016 09:05:15 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-233893870-1469005513-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
I agree that Prince’s keywords in the last table should not be 
included in the specification. I’m somewhat growing fond of the `fold`
 or `folio` (function) syntax I mentioned, though, because it’s 
cleaner than using `calc()`, can help avoid decimal representations of
 8th or 16th fractions and it would instantly cover the complete ISO, 
JIS, ANSI and `arch` series as soon as one size keyword is supported. 
Personally, I don’t care whether `foolscap`, `crown`, `demy`, `royal` 
and `imperial` (without hard-coded suffix) are included.

GitHub Notification of comment by Crissov
Please view or discuss this issue at 
using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 20 July 2016 09:05:29 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 5 July 2022 06:41:00 UTC