- From: craigkovatch via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 12 Jul 2016 00:24:35 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
I think those are reasonable points. You're right that it's not that hard to implement. It's kind of a bummer to make *everyone* implement such a low-level method. But my bigger concern is that people won't realize that .has() doesn't work in any useful way and the many debugging hours that could be lost to such a detail. At the very least, what would you think about the spec offering a note of caution? -- GitHub Notification of comment by craigkovatch Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/273#issuecomment-231904476 using your GitHub account
Received on Tuesday, 12 July 2016 00:24:45 UTC