- From: Ian Kilpatrick via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 14 Dec 2016 19:13:59 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
@eaenet and I were just talking about this. We may need to tighten the
wording further for when we fragment in the block direction. For
example:
```html
<style>
.container {
column-count: 2;
}
</style>
<div class=container>
<span class=cb>
<span class=abs1></span>
text which spans<!-- column break --> over two columns.
<span class=abs2></span>
</span>
</div>
```
In the above example two fragments are produced.
1) "text which spans"
2) "over two columns"
Which fragment should the `.abs1` and `.abs2` elements "anchor" to?
I think anchoring to the fragment which would have contained the
absolute child if it wasn't out of flow makes the most sense?
--
GitHub Notification of comment by bfgeek
Please view or discuss this issue at
https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/609#issuecomment-267127387
using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 14 December 2016 19:14:05 UTC