- From: Koji Ishii via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2016 09:23:28 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
>> break-word >> An otherwise unbreakable sequence of characters may be broken at an arbitrary point if there are no otherwise-acceptable break points in the line. > We could change it, but I don't think we should. Ah, ok, so "otherwise-acceptable break points" include hyphenation points. I just didn't interpret that way, but I'm fine with the conclusion. > Based on the spec, break-all should win: >> break-all >> [...] Hyphenation is not applied. IIRC this sentence doesn't intend that; its intention is "can break at non-hyphenation points, and does not insert hyphenation character," because we thought otherwise it may be misunderstood for Latin speakers. Also, `break-all` and `break-word` look two variation features of a same feature group to me, having hyphenation in between the two looks weird. -- GitHub Notification of comment by kojiishi Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/791#issuecomment-265397201 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 7 December 2016 09:23:34 UTC