W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-css-archive@w3.org > December 2016

Re: [csswg-drafts] [css-text-3] Priority between break-all/break-word/hyphens

From: Koji Ishii via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 07 Dec 2016 09:23:28 +0000
To: public-css-archive@w3.org
Message-ID: <issue_comment.created-265397201-1481102606-sysbot+gh@w3.org>
>> break-word
>> An otherwise unbreakable sequence of characters may be broken at an
 arbitrary point if there are no otherwise-acceptable break points in 
the line.

> We could change it, but I don't think we should.

Ah, ok, so "otherwise-acceptable break points" include hyphenation 
points. I just didn't interpret that way, but I'm fine with the 

> Based on the spec, break-all should win:

>> break-all
>> [...] Hyphenation is not applied.

IIRC this sentence doesn't intend that; its intention is "can break at
 non-hyphenation points, and does not insert hyphenation character," 
because we thought otherwise it may be misunderstood for Latin 

Also, `break-all` and `break-word` look two variation features of a 
same feature group to me, having hyphenation in between the two looks 

GitHub Notification of comment by kojiishi
Please view or discuss this issue at 
using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 7 December 2016 09:23:34 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Tuesday, 19 October 2021 01:30:26 UTC