- From: Amelia Bellamy-Royds via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 31 Aug 2016 18:00:37 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
OK, so you'd prefer if we standardize to have `[<type>+]#` instead of `[<type>#]+` (which is what we're currently using in SVG 2)? What about the cases where there are a fixed number of values, like the SVG 1.1 `<number-optional-number>` values? Any preferences? E.g., this is how @nikosandronikos fixed the viewBox syntax: `<number> ,? <number> ,? <number> ,? <number>` Not pretty, but clear & simple. Aside: I just realized this is going to be a pain in the behind for spec-ing layered strokes, because when it comes to stroke-dasharray, we actually *would* want a comma-separated list of space-separated lists, but we're not going to be able to do that for backwards compatibility reasons. -- GitHub Notification of comment by AmeliaBR Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/385#issuecomment-243848234 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 31 August 2016 18:00:43 UTC