- From: Amelia Bellamy-Royds via GitHub <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2016 18:59:09 +0000
- To: public-css-archive@w3.org
> At best, whether 0 is considered "positive" or not is ambiguous and context-sensitive. OK, I agree that a completely unambiguous terminology would be better. But the rest of my suggestion still stands: can we define `<non-negative-integer>`, `<non-negative-length>`, etc., data types, so that these restrictions do not have to be defined in prose? -- GitHub Notification of comment by AmeliaBR Please view or discuss this issue at https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/355#issuecomment-237336853 using your GitHub account
Received on Wednesday, 3 August 2016 19:01:15 UTC