- From: Annette Greiner <amgreiner@lbl.gov>
- Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2023 14:48:57 -0700
- To: Sandro Hawke <sandro@hawke.org>
- Cc: Team Community Process <team-community-process@w3.org>, public-credibility@w3.org
- Message-Id: <9BB7B07E-93E4-49B5-89A7-0AFEA6BC9212@lbl.gov>
Hey all, I just wanted too share the link to the Slack workspace in case anyone who’s interested in this group’s doings hasn’t already found their way to it. https://www.w3.org/wiki/Slack <https://www.w3.org/wiki/Slack> Annette Greiner NERSC User Experience Lead Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory amgreiner@lbl.gov > On Nov 1, 2023, at 10:01 AM, Sandro Hawke <sandro@hawke.org> wrote: > > The group met today, as nine people, and unanimously confirmed the benefit of having this group. We made a consensus plan to meet at least quarterly going forward. That looks like: 7 Feb, 1 May, and at TPAC 2024 (23-27 Sep). Scott Yates and I agreed to continue as chairs. > > Meeting records and details at https://credweb.org. We also started #credweb on the W3C slack. > > It's clear from the discussion today that misinformation as a problem continues to increase, and that standardized technologies may well be able to help in the future. It's also clear there's not yet a technical solution that has the momentum needed for standardization at W3C. So, for now, we'll keep the community connected and be a bit more ready to move forward if a solution emerges. > > Thanks everyone for helpful discussion today, and folks who've been posting "outros". It looks like we can switch those to just being "updates". If you haven't posted and didn't attend today, please do let us know what's going on for you in relation to combating misinformation. > > Thanks! > > -- Sandro > > On 10/20/23 16:01, Team Community Process wrote: >> Dear participants in the >> >> Credible Web Community Group >> https://www.w3.org/community/credibility/ >> >> In March 2023 we contacted you because your Community Group appeared to have become inactive (per [1]). Based on feedback in response to our message, we did not close the group, with the expectation that the group would soon become more active. Six months later, your group appears to still be inactive, and we are more inclined to close it unless we hear compelling reasons not to. >> >> If your group is in fact active, we recommend the following: >> >> * Let us know where the activity is going on so that we can update our data and improve our tools. >> >> * Update your group home page with news of your activities. Chairs can use the group Wordpress instance of the group to post news; let us know if you have any questions. >> >> If you have good reason to believe the group will soon become active, please let us know. >> >> If you are merely hopeful it will, or if you would like us to close the group, or if we do not hear from you in the next 30 days, we will plan to close the group. >> >> Thank you, >> >> CG/BG System >> >> [1] https://www.w3.org/community/about/faq/#close-inactive >> >> >> > >
Received on Wednesday, 1 November 2023 21:49:08 UTC