- From: Tom Jones <thomasclinganjones@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2021 21:44:38 -0700
- To: Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net>
- Cc: CredWeb CG <public-credibility@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAK2Cwb7Pv_Lrnym5OMqfeEmM3pBR5d30ZyFDUpvGty+-nX5Twg@mail.gmail.com>
This is now officially nutz. How do I get out of this? Be the change you want to see in the world ..tom On Wed, Sep 22, 2021 at 7:49 PM Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net> wrote: > Not that this group needs more evidence of the problem but here's some > <https://greenwald.substack.com/p/new-proof-emerges-of-the-biden-family?token=eyJ1c2VyX2lkIjozNzI2NDE5OSwicG9zdF9pZCI6NDE2NTU1MTksIl8iOiJBVVNseCIsImlhdCI6MTYzMjMzMzgzOSwiZXhwIjoxNjMyMzM3NDM5LCJpc3MiOiJwdWItMTI4NjYyIiwic3ViIjoicG9zdC1yZWFjdGlvbiJ9.VExF-WsNs9bSmeMDqYBsez-WPDOyMHvBuBmwEylHyV4> > that is pretty clear. > > From my perspective, it appears those who disbelieve the existence of the Deep > State <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_state> are engaging in artificial > ignorance > <https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/artificial-ignorance-owen-ambur/> in > service to The Politics Industry > <https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/politics-industry-v-we-people-magic-formula-owen-ambur/>. > There is nothing mysterious or particularly nefarious about it. People who > believe that more, bigger, centralized government is the solution to every > problem naturally will strive to create more of it. If that's what they > truly believe, who can blame them? Certainly not others who share their > point of view. > > Given that dynamic, relevant questions include: > > 1. how "deep" the State will become, > 2. how much the Fourth Estate > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fourth_Estate> may continue to > collaborate in further deepening it, > 3. whether the Fifth Estate > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fifth_Estate> will play a reinforcing > or counterbalancing role, > 4. at what point the "free world" virtually ceases to exist (and > whether, at that point, anyone will care) and > 5. what, if anything, this group may care to try to do about revealing > the personal values and political motivations that influence not only > perceptions of truth but also and particularly what is considered to be > *worthy* of attention. > > With respect to the fourth point, both extremes on the political spectrum > seem to fear the other will take us there but it is hard for me to see how > that can be the case when one side wants *less* government. How does > that lead to totalitarianism? I have yet to see any evidence that recent > immigrants from totalitarian countries fear that outcome from the > less-government side of the equation. I've seen multiple reports from > those who fear we're heading for what they left. > > See also some of the values espoused by George Orwell > <https://stratml.us/carmel/iso/TOFwStyle.xml#values_>. > > A related issue is that the lesson to be taken from Afghanistan, Syria, > NoKo, Russia, and China seems to be that brutality wins. The choice > between freedom and life isn't much of a choice for most people and those > most likely to impose that choice are those who believe they know what's > best for everyone else. Which side is arguing those who disagree with them > have no right to make a living, much less be left in peace to live their > lives as they see fit? > > BTW, for those who value stories, here's a short one: > > During a ride on the DC subway in 2016, that National Archives and Records > Administration's chief counsel told me that, although he was a strong > Democrat, he could not vote for Hillary Clinton because of her E-mail > server issue. Both he and I knew that she had willfully violated the > Federal Records Act but the news media helped to obfuscate that fact, in > order to minimize an October Surprise > <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/October_surprise#2016:_Clinton_vs._Trump> > adversely impacting their anointed candidate. > > In any event, our "democratic" political system had delivered two > candidates for which neither one of us could vote. If anyone believes such > a system is the best we can do, that's a pretty sad state of affairs. > > I believe we can do better ... albeit not if we continue to engage in > artificial ignorance. > > I look forward to learning what this group might be willing and able to do > about that. > Owen > https://www.linkedin.com/in/owenambur/ >
Received on Thursday, 23 September 2021 04:46:04 UTC