W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-credibility@w3.org > February 2021

Re: Public Editor

From: Sara-Jayne Terp <sarajterp@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 06:54:45 +0000
Message-ID: <CAOJBMoeCNp2P9W1U9JWNdZY7p0AXh0PLzaW19=8iYODMRhppfw@mail.gmail.com>
To: Bob Wyman <bob@wyman.us>
Cc: Daniel Schwabe <dschwabe@gmail.com>, Credible Web CG <public-credibility@w3.org>
I'm in regular contact with Nick, the person behind public editor, if you
want to link up.

On Tuesday, February 9, 2021, Bob Wyman <bob@wyman.us> wrote:

> Public Editor appears to be focused primarily on the quality of writing
> and reasoning. Unfortunately, those who speak truth often write poorly and
> those who lie often write brilliantly. Public Editor may help do what
> editors normally do; that is, improve the quality of writing. This is a
> useful purpose. However, I can't see that it helps much in
> determining which voices are credible or what statements are true.
>
> bob wyman
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 3:39 PM Daniel Schwabe <dschwabe@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I just came across this project, which might be of interest to many here.
>> This is a description of the main ideas, there’s more in other parts of the
>> website - https://www.publiceditor.io/blog/tech-tagworks.
>>
>> Has anyone had any contact or experience with it?
>>
>> Cheers
>> Daniel
>>
>

-- 
Sara-Jayne Terp
Strategist
Bodacea Light Industries LLC
sarajterp@gmail.com | +1 646 400 8497
www.overcognition.com | @bodaceacat
CogSecCollab: www.cogsec-collab.org
Received on Wednesday, 10 February 2021 06:54:59 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Wednesday, 10 February 2021 06:54:59 UTC