- From: Sara-Jayne Terp <sarajterp@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 10 Feb 2021 06:54:45 +0000
- To: Bob Wyman <bob@wyman.us>
- Cc: Daniel Schwabe <dschwabe@gmail.com>, Credible Web CG <public-credibility@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 10 February 2021 06:54:59 UTC
I'm in regular contact with Nick, the person behind public editor, if you want to link up. On Tuesday, February 9, 2021, Bob Wyman <bob@wyman.us> wrote: > Public Editor appears to be focused primarily on the quality of writing > and reasoning. Unfortunately, those who speak truth often write poorly and > those who lie often write brilliantly. Public Editor may help do what > editors normally do; that is, improve the quality of writing. This is a > useful purpose. However, I can't see that it helps much in > determining which voices are credible or what statements are true. > > bob wyman > > > On Tue, Feb 9, 2021 at 3:39 PM Daniel Schwabe <dschwabe@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I just came across this project, which might be of interest to many here. >> This is a description of the main ideas, there’s more in other parts of the >> website - https://www.publiceditor.io/blog/tech-tagworks. >> >> Has anyone had any contact or experience with it? >> >> Cheers >> Daniel >> > -- Sara-Jayne Terp Strategist Bodacea Light Industries LLC sarajterp@gmail.com | +1 646 400 8497 www.overcognition.com | @bodaceacat CogSecCollab: www.cogsec-collab.org
Received on Wednesday, 10 February 2021 06:54:59 UTC