Re: New doc: Options for RDF Expression of Credibility Data

I may not have much value to add to the content of this document but I 
look forward to learning from it and particularly to seeing how it can 
be implemented.

In the meantime, now available in StratML format are the about 
statements for the Concept Web Consortium, nanopub.org, and the 
Institute for Human & Machine Cognition, at 
https://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#CWA & 
https://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#IHMCUS

Owen

On 2/7/2020 11:41 PM, Sandro Hawke wrote:
> I made a ton of changes, trying to take everyone's comments into 
> account. I gave it a different title and URL, so as not to step all 
> over the comments on yesterday's draft.
>
> New version is Options for RDF Expression of Credibility Data 
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1-Z5gsTiqlJf7SGdyJ0N8ZesgOVurwGB_sdrmMAcnZ2g/edit>.
>
> I'm afraid the document may look a bit hostile toward shape 3 (named 
> graphs), because several people have now said they prefer that 
> approach, so I needed to get into some of the not-so-obvious 
> downsides. I'm pretty sure I don't actually have a bias here, and I'm 
> personally quite open to be convinced by issues I haven't considered. 
> The actual code changes in switching between shapes 1, 2, and 4 are 
> trivial; shape 3 requires some issues be solved first, as now 
> discussed in the draft.
>
> I also added JSON-LD versions, to go along with SPARQL and images.
>
>      -- Sandro
>