Re: Credweb - Data Access Task Force

On 2/5/20 11:03 AM, Sandro Hawke wrote:
> It looks like 11am Thursdays is a good time for just about everyone 
> who replied with interest on the technical/data issues.
>
> Let's try meeting this week, although I know it's only 24 hours 
> notice.  (06 February 2020 11am ET 
> <https://www.timeanddate.com/worldclock/fixedtime.html?msg=CredWeb&iso=20200206T11&p1=43&ah=1> 
> https://zoom.us/j/706868147). Given the short notice, we wont consider 
> any decisions binding yet.
>
> The agenda 
> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1UnQNpgAfY80-KvmLtredvbyhvhHHCPP6teQfTKdXQ94/edit#>currently 
> has one item, which maybe we can settle quickly, or maybe not.
>
> Feel free to reply in email or the agenda document with answers to the 
> agenda question:
>
>> How to express this in RDF (from Signal: Date Website First Archived 
>> <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1Gabi6ZwSvH-U-MTd3MG3RqEsSIAuKGD_OjG8RR0KL4g/edit#>):
>>
>>
>>  *
>>
>>     The website with its main page at URL https://news.mit.eduhas
>>     been operational as the same kind of site since at least date
>>     2015-09-02 as shown in the archive page at URL
>>     https://web.archive.org/web/20150902023223/http://news.mit.edu/
>>
>

Oops, this was an older version of the template, not the one we approved 
last week.  It should read:

  *

    There was a website operational at URL [ https://news.mit.edu  ] as
    early as isodate [ 2015-09-02 ], as shown in the archive page at URL
    [ https://web.archive.org/web/20150902023223/http://news.mit.edu/  ]


Sorry about any confusion.

       - s

> If that turns out to be easy, we can go on to more complicated signals.
>
> (In terms of writing down things in RDF, I'd suggest starting with 
> Turtle (Trig if quads), and then maybe looking at as JSON-LD as well.)
>
>     -- Sandro