- From: Owen Ambur <Owen.Ambur@verizon.net>
- Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2019 21:38:56 -0500
- To: public-credibility@w3.org
- Message-ID: <7c0f090c-4e36-58d0-d52e-70ab12c9be8d@verizon.net>
I doubt I'll want to take the time to watch/listen to any of the recordings of the Wiki Conference sessions but I'll look forward to seeing any summaries of the results that may be published. Via a word-find search, I see two references to WikiCred at the bottom of the agenda for November 10 <https://wikiconference.org/wiki/2019/Schedule#Sunday.2C_November_10> but no indications of the results. With reference to the November 8 <https://wikiconference.org/wiki/2019/Schedule#Friday.2C_November_8> session on strategies and models for GLAM Wiki partnerships, OpenGLAM's about statement is now available in StratML format at http://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#OGLAM I look forward to learning how their work might relate to the preservation of the Gullah Geechee heritage <https://gullahgeecheecorridor.org/>, which is a topic of focus of our comprehensive plan here on HHI: http://connectedcommunity.net/hhi/OPDT.xml#_33fb9cca-f745-11e9-a6ac-68de70babdf6 & http://connectedcommunity.net/hhi/OPDT.xml#_e2e7ecb4-04a8-11ea-aebd-b6018bbabdf6 The Reports' Lab's about statement is at http://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#RL ITPC's statement has been in the StratML collection since May 2016, at http://stratml.us/drybridge/index.htm#IPTC I look forward to learning about their plans and progress ... and perhaps documenting them in open, standard, machine-readable StratML Part 2, Performance Plan/Report, format for the benefit of those not on the call tomorrow. Owen On 11/11/2019 8:11 PM, Sandro Hawke wrote: > Meeting as usual tomorrow, with presentation from Brendan about what > they're doing at IPTC. Guests welcome. > > -- Sandro > > Blog > <https://www.w3.org/community/credibility/2019/11/12/update-wikicredcon-claimreview-iptc/> > post: > > *Last week* we talked about ClaimReview, with a presentation from > Chris Guess (group member and lead technologist at Duke Reporters > Lab). See notes > <https://docs.google.com/document/d/1_eOOdvgYrIVEw6Ug2eiSqPjPPfKy0pE2djyUk1pqkcA/edit> > and a video is available on request. ClaimReview continues to see wide > adoption as a way for fact checkers to make their results available to > platforms and other applications, and various improvements are in the > works. There’s now a high-level website about it, at > claimreviewproject.com <https://www.claimreviewproject.com/> > > *This past long weekend* a few of us attended WikiCredCon > <https://wikiconference.org/wiki/2019/Schedule>, a credibility-focused > instance of the North American Wiki Conference. > > I was fascinated to see more behind the scenes of the Wikipedia world > and was surprised how much difficult work is necessary to keep > Wikipedia running. Perhaps most daunting from a credibility > perspective is how hard it is to combat the sock puppets / bots. Many > parallel tracks, so each of us could only see a small slice of the > conference. Most sessions had extensive note-taking and even video > recording, thanks to sponsors. Not all the video is online yet, and > currently session notes are at the “etherpad” links from the session > detail pages; I imagine those might move soon. > > *This week (tomorrow)*, group member Brendan Quinn (Managing Director > of IPTC <https://iptc.org/about-iptc/> – the global standards body of > the news media) will present and lead a discussion about their current > work with credibility data interoperability. See you there! >
Received on Tuesday, 12 November 2019 02:39:07 UTC