plans for 2019

Hey folks,

Here's a quick update on where things are with Credibility at W3C. If 
you’re interested, please answer this survey 
<https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/103073/priorities-2019> on how you’d 
like to be involved. Newcomers are welcome, not just folks who were 
involved last year, and please help spread the word.

Things in the works for 2019:

 1. Evolve Credibility Signals
    <https://credweb.org/signals-20181021> into more of an open
    directory/database of credibility signal definitions, with filtering
    and data about adoption and research for each signal, when available.
 2. Document best practices for exchanging credibility data. Primarily
    technical (json-ld, csv), but also legal and commercial aspects.
 3. Revise our draft report <http://credweb.org/report> on credibility
    tech, maybe splitting it up into chunks people are more likely to
    read, and with different section editors.
 4. Have some general meetings, with presentations, to discuss various
    credibility-tech topics. This might include some of the signal
    provider companies or credibility tool projects.
 5. Document how credibility issues fit into larger Online Safety
    issues. I’d like a more specific and concrete handle on “First, Do
    No Harm”
    <https://credweb.org/report/20181011#first-do-no-harm-hazards-of-intervention>.
 6. Prototype a browser API which would support a market of credibility
    assessment modules, working together to protect the user in the
    browser. (See mockup
    <https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1ZfCzqCTtL4u5lYhY8eWid9ij33sqB51rJAgHXCxVwzc>.)

If you're up for working on any of these topics, please fill in the 
survey <https://www.w3.org/2002/09/wbs/103073/priorities-2019/>.  We’ll 
use that to help with meeting scheduling and general planning.

And of course, if you think the group should work on something not 
listed above, please reply on or off-list.

Thanks!

        -- Sandro