- From: Michael Herman (Trusted Digital Web) <mwherman@parallelspace.net>
- Date: Sat, 23 May 2026 18:24:39 +0000
- To: Amir Hameed <amsaalegal@gmail.com>, Filip Kolarik <filip26@gmail.com>
- CC: FOTIOY NIKOLAOS <fotiou@aueb.gr>, W3C Credentials CG <public-credentials@w3.org>, Drummond Reed <drummond.reed@gmail.com>
- Message-ID: <IA3PR13MB75418027F7C37FEAFBB4E239C30C2@IA3PR13MB7541.namprd13.prod.outlook.com>
Drummond and I addressed this, in part, by making sure Things (including Abstract Things) were included in the scope of the DID V1.0 specification. Michael Herman Web 7.0 Pando From: Amir Hameed <amsaalegal@gmail.com> Sent: Thursday, May 21, 2026 7:49 AM To: Filip Kolarik <filip26@gmail.com> Cc: FOTIOY NIKOLAOS <fotiou@aueb.gr>; W3C Credentials CG <public-credentials@w3.org> Subject: Re: CCG Meeting Ideas Hi Will and CCG Chairs, One discussion I think could be very interesting for the community is a simple but important question: How would the DID Core specification have been designed if it had emerged after the rise of LLMs, AI agents, and today’s regulatory landscape? Would the architecture, trust assumptions, permissions, delegation models, privacy considerations, and notions of identity have evolved differently? And more broadly, do we need to rethink identity itself in a world increasingly shaped by autonomous systems and agentic interactions? I think a discussion like this could lead to some valuable perspectives from both technical and non-technical participants. Best regards, Amir Hameed On Thu, 21 May 2026 at 2:28 AM, Filip Kolarik <filip26@gmail.com<mailto:filip26@gmail.com>> wrote: I would just like to add that the new EU Cyber Resilience Act significantly erodes, cripples, the startup ecosystem and software innovation in Europe in favor of large corporations that can absorb the massive compliance burden. The ultimate outcome is very questionable, and it risks making the situation worse. It illustrates the constant direction of damaging the EU tech ecosystem from within: GDPR, ChatControl, discussions around VPN regulation, and the CRA to seal the deal. Best, Filip https://www.linkedin.com/in/filipkolarik/ On Wed, May 20, 2026 at 9:58 PM FOTIOY NIKOLAOS <fotiou@aueb.gr<mailto:fotiou@aueb.gr>> wrote: Hi all, If there is any interest I am volunteering myself to talk about the new Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) EU regulation, which will affect companies wishing to make wallets (and software in general) available in the European market. Best, Nikos > On 20 May 2026, at 3:53 PM, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com<mailto:msporny@digitalbazaar.com>> wrote: > > On Wed, May 20, 2026 at 8:29 AM Will Abramson <will@legreq.com<mailto:will@legreq.com>> wrote: >> Alternatively, if there are people you would like to hear from, or projects and ideas you would like to see us discuss in the near future do let us know. > > A couple of ideas on topics that might be of interest to the > community, with general suggestions on who we should invite to > present: > > * Update on EUDI / ARF - what's going well, what's going badly (???) > * Protocol decisions that will lead to anti-competitive ecosystems (???) > * California Career Passport Project (CCCCO) > * Everlasting identity (KERI/ACDC community) > * How Watchers Prevent Duplicity (KERI/ACDC community) > * A State's Perspective on State Endorsed Digital Identity (Utah policymakers) > * An update on VCWG specifications (VCWG spec Editors) > > -- manu > > -- > Manu Sporny - https://www.linkedin.com/in/manusporny/ > Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. > https://www.digitalbazaar.com/ >
Received on Saturday, 23 May 2026 18:24:47 UTC