Re: [PROPOSAL]: Adopt DID-KR Key Recovery Extension as a CCG Work Item

Hi All

In view of the DID Key recovery extension work item proposal , is mailing
list sufficient to express interest for adoption of work item or I need to
put it as issue on CCG GitHub repo.

Regards
Amir Hameed

On Thu, 12 Mar 2026 at 1:20 PM, Amir Hameed <amsaalegal@gmail.com> wrote:

> Dear CCG Members,
>
> Two weeks ago I shared the draft specification for *DID-KR: Key Recovery
> Extension for Decentralized Identifiers* for community review and
> feedback.
>
> Thank you to everyone who took the time to review the proposal and
> contribute to the discussion. The feedback from members of the group has
> been very helpful in refining the direction of the specification and
> validating the problem space around decentralized identity key recovery.
>
> The DID-KR proposal introduces a recovery verification relationship for
> DID Documents and specifies multiple recovery mechanisms, including:
>
> • Social guardian-based recovery using verifiable secret sharing and
> zero-knowledge proofs
> • Deterministic seed-based recovery mechanisms
> • MPC-mediated recovery suitable for enterprise or infrastructure
> deployments
>
> The goal of the specification is to provide a standardized and
> interoperable approach to recovering control of decentralized identifiers
> when private keys are lost, while maintaining the self-sovereign principles
> of decentralized identity.
>
> The draft specification and issue tracker are currently hosted at Issues
> · sirraya-labs/did-kr <https://github.com/sirraya-labs/did-kr> and are
> open for community participation and contributions.
>
> Specification repository:
> https://github.com/sirraya-labs/did-kr
>
> Given the discussion and the interest expressed in exploring
> implementations, I would like to formally propose that the *DID-KR Key
> Recovery Extension* be adopted as a work item of the Credentials
> Community Group.
>
> I would be happy to serve as editor for the specification and coordinate
> with members of the community interested in reviewing, improving, or
> experimenting with implementations of the proposal.
>
> Implementers and contributors interested in exploring prototype
> implementations or interoperability considerations are very welcome to
> participate.
>
> Thank you again to the community for the constructive feedback and
> discussion.
>
> Best regards,
>
> Amir Hameed Mir
>