Re: [PROPOSED WORK ITEM] CEL DID Method (did:cel)

Hey All, it’s very hard to follow the whole thread and especially the
priors methods which I am sure must be taken into account before we go into
full discussion, I would suggest if we can create a tabular data document
where all existing methods their strengths, weakness and infrastructure can
be compared so that once we move ahead with CEL we have the whole context
of how DID evolved since its inception. That would help us have better
clarity.

Regards
Amir Hameed


On Sun, 4 Jan 2026 at 12:05 AM, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
wrote:

> Hey folks,
>
> Given the discussion over the past several weeks around did:cel,
> here's the work item adoption tracker issue:
>
> https://github.com/w3c-ccg/community/issues/255
>
> Please provide additional support in that issue if you haven't already
> done so via the mailing list.
>
> Thanks to everyone that has commented with suggestions on how we can
> potentially further align work happening in this area. I'll try to
> follow up on some of the comments that came in over the holidays to
> provide some more thoughts on alignment.
>
> -- manu
>
> --
> Manu Sporny - https://www.linkedin.com/in/manusporny/
> Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
> https://www.digitalbazaar.com/
>
>