- From: Phil Archer <phil.archer@gs1.org>
- Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2025 20:20:59 +0000
- To: Adrian Gropper <agropper@healthurl.com>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
- CC: "public-credentials@w3.org" <public-credentials@w3.org>, "public-vc-wg@w3.org" <public-vc-wg@w3.org>, "public-did-wg@w3.org" <public-did-wg@w3.org>
It's an interesting point, Adrian, and one that comes up in our discussions. So much of the DID work is focused on privacy which is obviously not an important feature for inanimate objects. @Manu - duly noted. Thank you. Phil On 12 February 2025 19:07, Adrian Gropper wrote: In the positive spirit of this thread and our desire to drive adoption of DIDs and VCs, wouldn't it make sense to clearly and intentionally separate work on use-cases like GS1 and use-cases that have human subjects? Adrian On Wed, Feb 12, 2025 at 9:02 AM Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com <mailto:msporny@digitalbazaar.com> > wrote: On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 7:40 AM Phil Archer <phil.archer@gs1.org <mailto:phil.archer@gs1.org> > wrote: > Following this work, GS1 is committed to taking small steps with VCs. Some of our GS1 Member Organisations (such as GS1 US, GS1 Netherlands and others) will be able to issue a VC proving that a GS1 identifier is licensed by a company we know. GS1 Global Office will act as a root of trust. This will be consistent with things like the UN Transparency Protocol. Phil, this is fantastic news! Even a crawl is forward movement and we are grateful to you, the team at GS1, and your industry for moving VCs and DIDs forward. Knowing the sheer size and scale of GS1, I know that this announcement was most likely years in the making. I can confirm that other parts of the trade and supply chain world are moving forward with DIDs and VCs and we can expect more announcements of this sort over the coming months to years. What concrete things can the communities CC'd on this email do to help GS1 in this endeavor? Public examples, interop tests, integration with vcplayground.org <http://vcplayground.org> , threat models, documentation, extensions to existing specifications? Once VCDM v2.0 is proposed as a global standard (next few months), we'll be in the position to consider new work for the next Verifiable Credentials WG Charter and DID Methods WG. How can we sculpt that work to help your efforts? -- manu -- Manu Sporny - https://www.linkedin.com/in/manusporny/ Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. https://www.digitalbazaar.com/ CONFIDENTIALITY / DISCLAIMER: The contents of this e-mail are confidential and are not to be regarded as a contractual offer or acceptance from GS1 (registered in Belgium). If you are not the addressee, or if this has been copied or sent to you in error, you must not use data herein for any purpose, you must delete it, and should inform the sender. GS1 disclaims liability for accuracy or completeness, and opinions expressed are those of the author alone. GS1 may monitor communications. Third party rights acknowledged. (c) 2020.
Received on Wednesday, 12 February 2025 20:21:14 UTC