- From: W3C Webmaster via GitHub API <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 02 Sep 2024 17:01:10 +0000
- To: public-credentials@w3.org
- Message-Id: <E1slAQQ-00DQ6F-0M@janus.w3.internal>
Issues
------
* w3c/controller-document (+3/-4/💬99)
3 issues created:
- Adjust framing to correctly describe relationship between the identifier and the controller (by jandrieu)
https://github.com/w3c/controller-document/issues/75
- Note that hash values might change during Candidate Recommendation (by selfissued)
https://github.com/w3c/controller-document/issues/73
- Add Controller Document examples to the Data Model section (by selfissued)
https://github.com/w3c/controller-document/issues/72
31 issues received 99 new comments:
- #75 Adjust framing to correctly describe relationship between the identifier and the controller (6 by dlongley, jandrieu, msporny, selfissued)
https://github.com/w3c/controller-document/issues/75 [editorial] [discuss]
- #73 Note that hash values might change during Candidate Recommendation (1 by msporny)
https://github.com/w3c/controller-document/issues/73 [ready for pr] [editorial]
- #72 Add Controller Document examples to the Data Model section (1 by selfissued)
https://github.com/w3c/controller-document/issues/72 [ready for pr] [editorial]
- #70 Context injection description favors Data Integrity securing method over JOSE COSE securing method (2 by msporny, selfissued)
https://github.com/w3c/controller-document/issues/70 [ready for pr]
- #69 Multibase character definition missing (1 by selfissued)
https://github.com/w3c/controller-document/issues/69 [ready for pr] [editorial]
- #68 Delete unnecessary Context Injection section (6 by BigBlueHat, filip26, iherman, msporny)
https://github.com/w3c/controller-document/issues/68 [discuss]
- #67 Delete unnecessary repetition of content defined elsewhere (4 by msporny, selfissued)
https://github.com/w3c/controller-document/issues/67 [discuss]
- #66 Correct inappropriate uses of w3id.org domain (5 by iherman, msporny, selfissued)
https://github.com/w3c/controller-document/issues/66
- #65 Representation of length of cryptographic hash unspecified (1 by selfissued)
https://github.com/w3c/controller-document/issues/65 [ready for pr] [editorial]
- #64 The party being delegated to is unspecified (7 by TallTed, decentralgabe, msporny, selfissued)
https://github.com/w3c/controller-document/issues/64 [discuss]
- #63 Ambiguous language about specifying claims (4 by dlongley, msporny, selfissued)
https://github.com/w3c/controller-document/issues/63 [ready for pr] [editorial]
- #62 Authentication verifier definition missing (1 by selfissued)
https://github.com/w3c/controller-document/issues/62 [ready for pr] [editorial]
- #61 Delete non-actionable statement about authentication (3 by msporny, selfissued)
https://github.com/w3c/controller-document/issues/61 [discuss]
- #60 Delete misleading text about possible purposes for authentication (3 by msporny, selfissued)
https://github.com/w3c/controller-document/issues/60 [discuss]
- #58 Missing link to verification method type definition (6 by dlongley, msporny, selfissued)
https://github.com/w3c/controller-document/issues/58 [discuss]
- #57 Verification method controller(s) and controller(s) note confusing (2 by iherman, selfissued)
https://github.com/w3c/controller-document/issues/57 [ready for pr] [editorial]
- #56 Verification method type definition missing (3 by dlongley, iherman, selfissued)
https://github.com/w3c/controller-document/issues/56 [pr exists] [editorial]
- #55 Authorization vs authentication note confusing (2 by iherman, selfissued)
https://github.com/w3c/controller-document/issues/55 [ready for pr] [editorial]
- #54 Delete `@context` from examples so as to not mislead readers (5 by decentralgabe, msporny, selfissued)
https://github.com/w3c/controller-document/issues/54 [discuss]
- #53 Add Definition Reference column to Controller Documents property table (2 by iherman, selfissued)
https://github.com/w3c/controller-document/issues/53 [ready for pr] [editorial]
- #52 Replace inline issues with GitHub issues (2 by msporny)
https://github.com/w3c/controller-document/issues/52 [pending close]
- #51 Add Controller Document examples to the Data Model section (3 by iherman, selfissued)
https://github.com/w3c/controller-document/issues/51 [ready for pr] [editorial]
- #50 Verification method definition wordy (6 by msporny, selfissued)
https://github.com/w3c/controller-document/issues/50 [discuss]
- #49 Cryptographic suite definition currently focuses on specifications rather than functionality (1 by iherman)
https://github.com/w3c/controller-document/issues/49 [pr exists] [editorial]
- #48 Authentication definition overly specific (7 by msporny, selfissued)
https://github.com/w3c/controller-document/issues/48 [ready for pr] [discuss]
- #47 RFC 2119 key word NOT RECOMMENDED is missing (4 by TallTed, msporny, selfissued)
https://github.com/w3c/controller-document/issues/47 [pending close]
- #46 Sections marked informative should be normative (7 by jyasskin, msporny, selfissued)
https://github.com/w3c/controller-document/issues/46 [pr exists] [editorial] [discuss]
- #45 Note that controllers can control multiple keys (1 by msporny)
https://github.com/w3c/controller-document/issues/45 [ready for pr] [editorial]
- #37 Fix `vmPurpose` / `vmPurposes` discrepancy in Retrieve Verification Method algorithm (1 by msporny)
https://github.com/w3c/controller-document/issues/37 [ready for pr] [editorial]
- #35 Define "valid" (1 by msporny)
https://github.com/w3c/controller-document/issues/35 [pr exists] [editorial]
- #21 (Minor) Data model reference? (1 by msporny)
https://github.com/w3c/controller-document/issues/21 [ready for pr]
4 issues closed:
- Fix `vmPurpose` / `vmPurposes` discrepancy in Retrieve Verification Method algorithm https://github.com/w3c/controller-document/issues/37 [ready for pr] [editorial]
- Define "valid" https://github.com/w3c/controller-document/issues/35 [pr exists] [editorial]
- Add Controller Document examples to the Data Model section https://github.com/w3c/controller-document/issues/51 [ready for pr] [editorial]
- Replace inline issues with GitHub issues https://github.com/w3c/controller-document/issues/52 [pending close]
* w3c/vc-data-model (+2/-0/💬7)
2 issues created:
- A wrong VCDM 2.0 context URL (by filip26)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/1556
- Can we change `Usage Patterns` to `Patterns of Use` throughout? (by TallTed)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/1555
3 issues received 7 new comments:
- #1555 Can we change `Usage Patterns` to `Patterns of Use` throughout? (3 by davidlehn, iherman, longpd)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/1555 [editorial]
- #1551 Rename VC Specifications Registry to VC Extensions (3 by iherman, longpd)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/1551 [editorial] [pending close] [CR1]
- #1538 Respec's VC plugin still does not work (1 by iherman)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/1538 [editorial] [CR1]
* w3c/vc-bitstring-status-list (+1/-0/💬0)
1 issues created:
- TTL is mandatory 5 hour period if not specified (by msporny)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-bitstring-status-list/issues/174
* w3c/vc-data-integrity (+2/-0/💬1)
2 issues created:
- Move Contexts and Vocabularies content about Data Integrity to the Data Integrity specification (by selfissued)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-integrity/issues/308
- Unused reference [mimesniff] (by selfissued)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-integrity/issues/306
1 issues received 1 new comments:
- #34 nonce property (1 by farwayer)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-integrity/issues/34 [question] [pending close (7 days)]
* w3c/vc-di-ecdsa (+0/-1/💬1)
1 issues received 1 new comments:
- #69 [Editorial] Making the RCH hash function reference more explicit (1 by msporny)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-di-ecdsa/issues/69 [editorial]
1 issues closed:
- [Editorial] Making the RCH hash function reference more explicit https://github.com/w3c/vc-di-ecdsa/issues/69 [editorial]
* w3c/vc-di-eddsa (+0/-1/💬1)
1 issues received 1 new comments:
- #96 Update developer test fixtures to use did:key to identify issuer(s) and verification method(s) (1 by msporny)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-di-eddsa/issues/96
1 issues closed:
- Update developer test fixtures to use did:key to identify issuer(s) and verification method(s) https://github.com/w3c/vc-di-eddsa/issues/96
* w3c/vc-jose-cose (+1/-3/💬0)
1 issues created:
- need clearity in sd-jwt example. (by shrikantbache)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-jose-cose/issues/296
3 issues closed:
- Clarification on usage of nbf claim https://github.com/w3c/vc-jose-cose/issues/275 [editorial] [has-pr]
- Add comments on encryption re:OpenID https://github.com/w3c/vc-jose-cose/issues/175 [has-pr] [post-CR]
- Add external references to Privacy and Security sections https://github.com/w3c/vc-jose-cose/issues/81 [editorial] [has-pr] [post-CR]
* w3c/vc-json-schema (+3/-0/💬4)
3 issues created:
- Update media types to conform to the VC Data Model (by decentralgabe)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-json-schema/issues/236 [editorial]
- Question regarding JsonSchemaCredential (by mjfelis)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-json-schema/issues/235
- unresolvable https://www.w3.org/2022/credentials/v2/json-schema-credential-schema.json (by mjfelis)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-json-schema/issues/234
2 issues received 4 new comments:
- #235 Question regarding JsonSchemaCredential (3 by decentralgabe, mjfelis)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-json-schema/issues/235 [discuss]
- #234 unresolvable https://www.w3.org/2022/credentials/v2/json-schema-credential-schema.json (1 by decentralgabe)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-json-schema/issues/234 [bug]
Pull requests
-------------
* w3c/controller-document (+10/-3/💬15)
10 pull requests submitted:
- Remove normative text in informative section. (by msporny)
https://github.com/w3c/controller-document/pull/84
- Note that controllers do not need to be single individuals. (by msporny)
https://github.com/w3c/controller-document/pull/83 [editorial]
- Reference DID Core as requested by @iherman (by msporny)
https://github.com/w3c/controller-document/pull/82 [editorial]
- Replace use of undefined term authentication verifier (by selfissued)
https://github.com/w3c/controller-document/pull/81 [editorial]
- Improve assertionMethod definition (by selfissued)
https://github.com/w3c/controller-document/pull/80 [editorial]
- Describe choice of verification material formats (by selfissued)
https://github.com/w3c/controller-document/pull/79 [editorial]
- List defined verification method types (by selfissued)
https://github.com/w3c/controller-document/pull/78 [editorial]
- Tighten cryptosuite wording (by selfissued)
https://github.com/w3c/controller-document/pull/77
- Add examples to Data Model section (by selfissued)
https://github.com/w3c/controller-document/pull/76
- Remove inline issues (by selfissued)
https://github.com/w3c/controller-document/pull/74
7 pull requests received 15 new comments:
- #84 Remove normative text in informative section. (1 by selfissued)
https://github.com/w3c/controller-document/pull/84
- #78 List defined verification method types (1 by selfissued)
https://github.com/w3c/controller-document/pull/78 [editorial]
- #71 Editorial improvements resulting from review of 20240817 draft (1 by msporny)
https://github.com/w3c/controller-document/pull/71 [editorial]
- #44 Changed valid to conforming for controller and vm documents (1 by msporny)
https://github.com/w3c/controller-document/pull/44 [editorial]
- #43 Context section consistency issue 10 (6 by filip26, iherman, msporny)
https://github.com/w3c/controller-document/pull/43 [editorial] [DO NOT MERGE]
- #42 Specify that controller overrides subject control. (4 by dlongley, iherman, jandrieu, selfissued)
https://github.com/w3c/controller-document/pull/42 [DO NOT MERGE]
- #41 Remove references to "proof purpose". (1 by iherman)
https://github.com/w3c/controller-document/pull/41 [editorial]
3 pull requests merged:
- Editorial improvements resulting from review of 20240817 draft
https://github.com/w3c/controller-document/pull/71 [editorial]
- Changed valid to conforming for controller and vm documents
https://github.com/w3c/controller-document/pull/44 [editorial]
- Remove references to "proof purpose".
https://github.com/w3c/controller-document/pull/41 [editorial]
* w3c/vc-data-model (+1/-1/💬7)
1 pull requests submitted:
- Fix #1556 (by filip26)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/pull/1557
3 pull requests received 7 new comments:
- #1557 Fix #1556 (1 by w3cbot)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/pull/1557
- #1554 Proof reading for Section 8 - Privacy (5 by TallTed, decentralgabe, iherman)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/pull/1554
- #1553 Set some reserved properties to regular in the vocabulary (1 by msporny)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/pull/1553 [editorial] [CR1]
1 pull requests merged:
- Set some reserved properties to regular in the vocabulary
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/pull/1553 [editorial] [CR1]
* w3c/vc-data-integrity (+1/-0/💬1)
1 pull requests submitted:
- Clarify previousProof verification. (by aljones15)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-integrity/pull/307
1 pull requests received 1 new comments:
- #307 Clarify previousProof verification. (1 by PatStLouis)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-integrity/pull/307
* w3c/vc-di-ecdsa (+0/-3/💬3)
3 pull requests received 3 new comments:
- #72 Update test vectors to use did:key as the verification method. (1 by msporny)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-di-ecdsa/pull/72 [editorial] [CR1]
- #71 Editorial Review: Update references, check wording, formatting, and such (1 by msporny)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-di-ecdsa/pull/71 [editorial] [CR1]
- #70 Making the RCH hash function reference more explicit (1 by msporny)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-di-ecdsa/pull/70 [editorial] [CR1]
3 pull requests merged:
- Update test vectors to use did:key as the verification method.
https://github.com/w3c/vc-di-ecdsa/pull/72 [editorial] [CR1]
- Editorial Review: Update references, check wording, formatting, and such
https://github.com/w3c/vc-di-ecdsa/pull/71 [editorial] [CR1]
- Making the RCH hash function reference more explicit
https://github.com/w3c/vc-di-ecdsa/pull/70 [editorial] [CR1]
* w3c/vc-di-eddsa (+0/-2/💬2)
2 pull requests received 2 new comments:
- #97 Update test vectors to use did:key for verification method (1 by msporny)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-di-eddsa/pull/97
- #95 Editorial review: terminology, clarity, reference consistency (1 by msporny)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-di-eddsa/pull/95 [editorial] [CR1]
2 pull requests merged:
- Update test vectors to use did:key for verification method
https://github.com/w3c/vc-di-eddsa/pull/97
- Editorial review: terminology, clarity, reference consistency
https://github.com/w3c/vc-di-eddsa/pull/95 [editorial] [CR1]
* w3c/vc-di-bbs (+0/-1/💬1)
1 pull requests received 1 new comments:
- #182 Update Procedures related to Optional Features (1 by msporny)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-di-bbs/pull/182 [normative] [CR1]
1 pull requests merged:
- Update Procedures related to Optional Features
https://github.com/w3c/vc-di-bbs/pull/182 [normative] [CR1]
* w3c/vc-jose-cose (+1/-3/💬3)
1 pull requests submitted:
- Use Controller Documents specification (by selfissued)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-jose-cose/pull/297
3 pull requests received 3 new comments:
- #294 Add reference to NIST SP-800-122 (1 by decentralgabe)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-jose-cose/pull/294 [editorial]
- #293 Describe encrypting secured credentials and presentations (1 by decentralgabe)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-jose-cose/pull/293
- #291 Use of nbf is NOT RECOMMENDED (1 by decentralgabe)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-jose-cose/pull/291 [normative]
3 pull requests merged:
- Use of nbf is NOT RECOMMENDED
https://github.com/w3c/vc-jose-cose/pull/291 [normative]
- Describe encrypting secured credentials and presentations
https://github.com/w3c/vc-jose-cose/pull/293
- Add reference to NIST SP-800-122
https://github.com/w3c/vc-jose-cose/pull/294 [editorial]
* w3c/vc-data-model-2.0-test-suite (+3/-3/💬0)
3 pull requests submitted:
- moved securing mechanism tests and added enveloped related functions (by PatStLouis)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model-2.0-test-suite/pull/114
- Revert "Address TODO and QOL improvements" (by PatStLouis)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model-2.0-test-suite/pull/113
- Extract enveloped credentials (by PatStLouis)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model-2.0-test-suite/pull/112
3 pull requests merged:
- Clean up more TODOs.
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model-2.0-test-suite/pull/108
- Revert "Address TODO and QOL improvements"
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model-2.0-test-suite/pull/113
- Use @db/vc ^7.
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model-2.0-test-suite/pull/111
Repositories tracked by this digest:
-----------------------------------
* https://github.com/w3c/vc-overview
* https://github.com/w3c/vc-use-cases
* https://github.com/w3c/controller-document
* https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model
* https://github.com/w3c/vc-bitstring-status-list
* https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-integrity
* https://github.com/w3c/vc-di-ecdsa
* https://github.com/w3c/vc-di-eddsa
* https://github.com/w3c/vc-di-bbs
* https://github.com/w3c/vc-jose-cose
* https://github.com/w3c/vc-json-schema
* https://github.com/w3c/vc-specs-dir
* https://github.com/w3c/vc-imp-guide
* https://github.com/w3c/vc-test-suite-implementations
* https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model-2.0-test-suite
* https://github.com/w3c/vc-bitstring-status-list-test-suite
* https://github.com/w3c/vc-di-ecdsa-test-suite
* https://github.com/w3c/vc-di-eddsa-test-suite
* https://github.com/w3c/vc-di-ed25519signature2020-test-suite
* https://github.com/w3c/vc-di-bbs-test-suite
* https://github.com/w3c/vc-jose-cose-test-suite
* https://github.com/w3c/vc-json-schema-test-suite
* https://github.com/w3c/respec-vc
--
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 2 September 2024 17:01:11 UTC