- From: Kim Hamilton <kimdhamilton@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 20 Mar 2024 11:14:20 -0700
- To: Julien Fraichot <Julien.Fraichot@hyland.com>
- Cc: Christopher Allen <ChristopherA@lifewithalacrity.com>, Kaliya Identity Woman <kaliya@identitywoman.net>, Orie Steele <orie@transmute.industries>, "W3C Credentials CG (Public List)" <public-credentials@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAFmmOze_1o6UUaKxFyS5wpmRVbYedaFj7cayO-tbCwhUCD5cyA@mail.gmail.com>
On third re-read, is this pointing to the distinction between disclosable and disclosed? I need to check that paragraph again. On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 11:11 AM Kim Hamilton <kimdhamilton@gmail.com> wrote: > Good catch Julien. You are right. > > On Wed, Mar 20, 2024 at 10:45 AM Julien Fraichot < > Julien.Fraichot@hyland.com> wrote: > >> >> - selective disclosure in SD-JWT/CWT/ecdsa-sd/mDoc is that only the >> issuer can choose what fields are selectively disclosable >> >> >> >> So not to add more confusion in a confused premise, I don’t think that’s >> entirely true, at least in ecdsa-sd with which I’ve recently played. While >> some fields are deemed mandatory by the issuer, provided the >> wallet/selective disclosure UI offers the possibility of selecting fields, >> the holder has total control over which fields can be selectively disclosed. >> >> >> >> >> >> *From: *Christopher Allen <ChristopherA@lifewithalacrity.com> >> *Date: *Wednesday, 20 March 2024 at 06:22 >> *To: *Kim Hamilton <kimdhamilton@gmail.com> >> *Cc: *Kaliya Identity Woman <kaliya@identitywoman.net>, Orie Steele >> <orie@transmute.industries>, W3C Credentials CG (Public List) < >> public-credentials@w3.org> >> *Subject: *[EXTERNAL] [jfraichot@learningmachine.com] Re: VC formats >> >> *CAUTION: *This email originated from outside of Hyland. Do not click >> links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and know the >> content is safe. >> >> >> >> On Tue, Mar 19, 2024 at 8:20 PM Kim Hamilton <kimdhamilton@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >> That comparison matrix is gold, thanks! Spice isn’t there but that did >> come after IIW. >> >> >> >> There’s a lot in there and it seems a bit overwhelming. However I think >> most of us are necessarily abstracting away from this level, assuming a >> multi-model/format/etc world, to focus on business value, other aspects of >> the ecosystem, etc. >> >> >> >> As that happens, I think communities like this can play an important role >> in facilitating understanding of impact of these differences on people. >> Exciting stuff ahead! >> >> >> >> Kim, >> >> >> >> I also want to make it clear that Gordian Envelope is somewhat at a >> different layer than the other examples (SD-JWT, SD-CWT, ecdsa-sd, mDoc) in >> that it is more generalized to be useful for any authenticated data, in >> particular data at rest, and thus is not solely for credential data. Its >> focus is more on data minimization, and can be used for health-care data, >> AI foundation models, business data, other forms of PII, etc. Gordian >> Envelope can be used for credentials as well, but right now there is no >> funding to make it aligned with VCDM. Should be possible, but you lose some >> of the privacy benefits that allows any holder (not just subject-holder, >> but any holder) more choices for what to selectively disclose, or >> selectively correlate (another useful property!). >> >> >> >> One my concerns with selective disclosure in SD-JWT/CWT/ecdsa-sd/mDoc is >> that only the issuer can choose what fields are selectively disclosable, >> which IMHO they will only do if it is in their interest, which may not >> necessary be the interest of the subject, or other holders (for instance, >> an employer holding a employee subject credentials may have other needs to >> elide that are different than the issuer and the subject). One particular >> consequence of this is that there may be very few fields in a credential >> that are selectively disclosable. Combined with various approaches for >> "holder binding", things become even more challenging. There are also some >> questions about when it is appropriate to do BBS to also anti-correlate >> signatures — there are cases where it might not make sense. No easy >> solutions! >> >> >> >> -- Christopher Allen >> >> >> ----------------------------------------- Please consider the environment >> before printing this e-mail ----------------------------------------- >> >> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This message and any attached documents may >> contain confidential information from Hyland Software, Inc. The information >> is intended only for the use of the individual or entity named above. If >> the reader of this message is not the intended recipient, or an employee or >> agent responsible for the delivery of this message to the intended >> recipient, the reader is hereby notified that any dissemination, >> distribution or copying of this message or of any attached documents, or >> the taking of any action or omission to take any action in reliance on the >> contents of this message or of any attached documents, is strictly >> prohibited. If you have received this communication in error, please notify >> the sender immediately by e-mail or telephone, at +1 (440) 788-5000, and >> delete the original message immediately. Thank you. >> >
Received on Wednesday, 20 March 2024 18:14:37 UTC