- From: Paola Di Maio <paola.dimaio@gmail.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 09:39:11 +0100
- To: ステファニー タン(SBIホールディングス) <tstefan@sbigroup.co.jp>
- Cc: "public-credentials@w3.org" <public-credentials@w3.org>
Received on Tuesday, 16 January 2024 08:42:23 UTC
Stephanie, in my understanding, the latest verified credential implies that all the credentials before were verified, So provided the chain is not broken and comes with a seal of process integrity, the last step in the unbroken chain implies all the previous steps were verified So my effort is in the robust design of process integrity Let us know if you have the chance to experiment with this Paola Di Maio, PhD Process Engineer On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 9:35 AM ステファニー タン(SBIホールディングス) < tstefan@sbigroup.co.jp> wrote: > Hi, all > > This might seem like a silly question, so I hope you would indulge me. > > In the context of using VCs in a traceability context (for example, supply > chain). As the product moves along the supply chain and verifiable > credentials are also issued by each actor (to represent certifications of > inspection, etc. and might differ depending on the product), I imagine that > the VP at the end would be difficult to verify since the contents become > very long and complex to inspect. > > In such a case, I am looking for real-life use cases or examples on how > this complexity is handled. I assumed that it might be through an interface > of some sort… > > Any thoughts or comments are very much appreciated. Thank you in advance. > > Best, > Stefannie >
Received on Tuesday, 16 January 2024 08:42:23 UTC