Re: What if: there was an AI-based Dynamic DID Method Generator that DID away with static DID Methods?

st 25. 12. 2024 v 16:48 odesílatel Michael Herman (Trusted Digital Web) <
mwherman@parallelspace.net> napsal:

> Daniel, I’m about to catch a flight to Malta …so this explanation might be
> too short…
>
>
>
> The Web 7.0 *did:category* Dynamic DID Method Generator LLM anchors the
> ~4.1 million DID Methods it is capable of dynamically generating using
> about a dozen top-level (static) DID Methods (DID Method clusters). The
> implication, as seen in the red spreadsheet, is that there a *natural
> predictable hierarchy* of basic DID Method names (e.g.
> did:nature:lifeforms:animals:fish:speckledtrout:eartag:1234).  How can this
> be exploited?
>
>
>
> How about if there was a natural inheritance mechanism that allowed for a
> DID without a service endpoint in its DID Document (or no DID Document at
> all) to be resolved using inheritance? The resolver simply looks “one level
> up” to see if the parent Method name has a DID Document, etc. etc.  This
> becomes pretty cool – especially when coupled with the Web 7.0 pattern for *load-balanced
> service endpoints*. 😊 😊  See below.  The mechanism used here is “the
> prefix of any hierarchical DID is also a DID” …and may or may not have a
> DID Document:
>

Given that each method has its own spec, isnt it possible to do inheritance
already, similar to URNs?


>
>
> Each of the following is a DID (with a corresponding DID subject) –
> potentially each with its own DID Document (or not):
>
>
>
>    - did:nature:lifeforms
>    - did:nature:lifeforms:animals
>    - did:nature:lifeforms:animals:fish
>    - did:nature:lifeforms:animals:fish:speckledtrout
>    - did:nature:lifeforms:animals:fish:speckledtrout:eartag
>    - did:nature:lifeforms:animals:fish:speckledtrout:eartag:1234
>
>
>
> “More news at 11…”,
>
> Michael Herman
>
> CEO and First Principles Thinker
>
> Web 7.0 Foundation / Trusted Digital Web (TDW)
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Michael Herman (Trusted Digital Web) <mwherman@parallelspace.net>
> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 25, 2024 4:53 AM
> *To:* Daniel Hardman <daniel.hardman@gmail.com>
> *Cc:* public-credentials (public-credentials@w3.org) <
> public-credentials@w3.org>
> *Subject:* Re: What if: there was an AI-based Dynamic DID Method
> Generator that DID away with static DID Methods?
>
>
>
> CORRECTION: Here's a very small sample from the ~1.5 million potential
> *basic* DID Methods (~4.1 million actual potential Methods)... (See
> previous chart).
>
>
>
> Michael Herman
>
> First Principles Thinker
>
> Web 7.0 Foundation / Trusted Digital Web (TDW)
>
>
>
> Get Outlook for Android <https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>
> ------------------------------
>
> *From:* Michael Herman (Trusted Digital Web)
> *Sent:* Wednesday, December 25, 2024 12:28:10 AM
> *To:* Daniel Hardman <daniel.hardman@gmail.com>
> *Cc:* public-credentials (public-credentials@w3.org) <
> public-credentials@w3.org>
> *Subject:* RE: What if: there was an AI-based Dynamic DID Method
> Generator that DID away with static DID Methods?
>
>
>
> Joyeux Noel Daniel,
>
> Here’s a very small sample…full resolution…drawn from the Web 7.0
> did:category LLM containing ~1.5 million DID Methods…
>
>
>
>
>
> Michael Herman
> CEO
>
> Web 7.0 Foundation / Trusted Digital Web (TDW)
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Daniel Hardman <daniel.hardman@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, December 24, 2024 5:06 PM
> *To:* Michael Herman (Trusted Digital Web) <mwherman@parallelspace.net>
> *Cc:* public-credentials (public-credentials@w3.org) <
> public-credentials@w3.org>
> *Subject:* Re: What if: there was an AI-based Dynamic DID Method
> Generator that DID away with static DID Methods?
>
>
>
> This brought a smile to my face ...
>
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 24, 2024, 5:47 AM Michael Herman (Trusted Digital Web) <
> mwherman@parallelspace.net> wrote:
>
> It would be pretty cool, eh? 😊
> [cid:image001.jpg@01DB5609.D9CAE9D0]
>
> Best wishes and Merry Christmas,
> Michael Herman
> Web 7.0 Foundation / Trusted Digital Web (TDW)
>
>