Re: Goals and Requirements for DID Method Standardization?

On Thu, Dec 12, 2024 at 1:59 AM Bryan Newbold <bryan@blueskyweb.xyz> wrote:
> New subscriber and group member here. I work at Bluesky on the AT
> Protocol, including the account identity system, which builds on DIDs.
> I wanted to
> share some of the criteria we used when assessing DID methods in the
> past, as well as some constraints on DID methods that make them work
> well (or not) for applications like ours.

Hey Bryan, thanks a ton for weighing in on this thread and providing
input wrt. what sorts of features would be compelling for BlueSky's
usage of DIDs.

We are currently discussing what this feature set should be in
general, for the upcoming DID Methods we're planning to put on the
global standards track next year, so your input is timely.

I've added your list to the issue tracker and will make sure that the
group is aware of your input during our next cross-community DID
Methods Standardization meeting:

https://github.com/decentralized-identity/did-methods/issues/10#issuecomment-2539832510

As always, if there are other requirements that you think of later, or
if we can help in any further way, please let us know. I appreciate
you taking the time to send this in given how incredibly busy everyone
at BlueSky must be given the mass influx of people your platform is
receiving.

-- manu

-- 
Manu Sporny - https://www.linkedin.com/in/manusporny/
Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
https://www.digitalbazaar.com/

Received on Thursday, 12 December 2024 19:27:40 UTC