- From: Orie Steele <orie@transmute.industries>
- Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2023 07:56:36 -0500
- To: Anthony Nadalin <nadalin@prodigy.net>
- Cc: Daniel Goldscheider <daniel@openwallet.foundation>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, Adrian Gropper <agropper@healthurl.com>, Kaliya Identity Woman <kaliya@identitywoman.net>, Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org>, technical-discuss@lists.openwallet.foundation
- Message-ID: <CAN8C-_Js4RvtSN7Jai7b_HvEyfrOaa0w4p7SqoS+hrJd0mGHwQ@mail.gmail.com>
Recent comments on ISO on CFRG: https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/cfrg/ACDxbVS-vWHjTWFCUGQQfAiFeK0/ OS On Thu, Oct 19, 2023, 10:40 PM <nadalin@prodigy.net> wrote: > This response is very ill informed as they are referencing 18013-5:2021 > which is not the current version being worked upon, there many parts to > mDL, its just not a single spcification > > > > *From:* Daniel Goldscheider <daniel@openwallet.foundation> > *Sent:* Thursday, October 19, 2023 2:06 PM > *To:* Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> > *Cc:* Adrian Gropper <agropper@healthurl.com>; Kaliya Identity Woman < > kaliya@identitywoman.net>; Credentials Community Group < > public-credentials@w3.org>; technical-discuss@lists.openwallet.foundation > *Subject:* Re: [technical-discuss] Civil Society Response to TSA mDL Rule > Making > > > > Thank you Manu. > > > > I meant OpenWallet when I said *we* but probably should have been more > precise. 😉 > > > > Your offer is > appreciated. > 18015-5 > > > > :D > > > > > > On 19 Oct 2023, at 13:59, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 19, 2023 at 4:06 PM Daniel Goldscheider > <daniel@openwallet.foundation> wrote: > > In my mind, they should know that we value their perspective and want to > speak with them. If they lack time or interest to talk to us that’s their > prerogative of course. > > > They know we value their perspective and that we want to speak with > them... because we've been speaking with them and have told them how > much we value their perspective over the past several years. :) > > Members from the W3C CCG and W3C VCWG have had multiple interactions > with these groups going back many years now... there are many places > of alignment on desired outcomes wrt. digital credentials and open > wallet ecosystems. > > Kaliya is right -- there is value in expending effort to engage with > these groups as openly and transparently as possible, and in trying to > build a privacy-respecting future in full view of the public ...with a > huge thanks to Kaliya that does that better than almost all of us :). > > Nick Doty, from CDT, is one of the Chairs of the W3C Privacy group > (and co-author on that mDL statement). Most recently, they did a > Privacy and Security Review of W3C Verifiable Credentials, so that > language around VCs in the letter was a "well-informed" statement: > > https://www.w3.org/Privacy/IG/summaries/PING-minutes-20230817 > > I view the OWF statement in the document as a positive as well... > Daniel, we'll pull you into future meeting possibilities with these > organizations; it's important for them to understand the "open wallet" > philosophy that we all share. You might consider presenting to the W3C > PING, who has more than a few of these people in attendance on a > fairly regular basis. > > -- manu > > -- > Manu Sporny - https://www.linkedin.com/in/manusporny/ > Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. > https://www.digitalbazaar.com/ > >
Received on Friday, 20 October 2023 12:56:54 UTC