- From: Wayne Chang <wayne@spruceid.com>
- Date: Thu, 4 May 2023 11:07:44 -0400
- To: W3C Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org>
- Cc: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>, Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>, Mike Prorock <mprorock@mesur.io>, "Rocco, Gregory" <rocco@spruceid.com>
- Message-ID: <CAFTzAXgrOoWSdHAtYzzexTGCXHo5NfqvSr6ea+Y9j7W0kLU66w@mail.gmail.com>
Hi all, in recognition of the minutes we'll never get back from our lives due to this thread, Rocco and I are proud to release the following upgrade to did-doge: https://github.com/spruceid/did-doge/pull/14 https://spruceid.github.io/did-doge/ Best, - Wayne On Thu, May 4, 2023 at 10:43 AM Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com> wrote: > On Thu, May 4, 2023 at 3:39 AM Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com> > wrote: > > I believe associating the W3C logo with Dogecoin could have a negative > impact on this group, as Dogecoin has a less than favorable reputation. > > Just to weigh in on this thread -- anyone speaking that hasn't engaged > legal counsel is out of their depth. What may seem like a simple case > is not. > > There is a conflict here between W3C's trademark (and the > dodge-derived logo is begging them to enforce their trademark lest > they lose it), fair use, and use of trademarks and copyrights for the > purposes of parody. > > There are potentially good arguments both ways, but the second we > summon the lawyers, we've all lost. We shouldn't pull W3C staff in > because (speaking as a W3C Member that pays dues, which are then used > to pay staff and legal counsel), this topic is a waste of W3C Member > funding. It also calls into question W3C's trademark and the > enforcement thereof (if you don't enforce your trademark, you can lose > it). > > Wayne, you might consider (and this is clearly not legal advice; > you'll want to consult counsel), asserting that the did-doge logo > falls under a parody defense, you claim no commercial rights, you have > no products or plan of any products that use the logo, and state > clearly why you don't believe that this dilutes W3C's brand or causes > "customer confusion". IOW, make it clear that this is a joke that > you're not profiting off of and that doesn't cause harm or dilution to > W3C's brand/reputation... or, just change the logo. :) > > This stuff can get really messy and complicated. Case in point, > another dog-related trademark dilution case that recently worked its > way through the courts with surprising outcomes: > > > https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/trademark-parody-and-freedom-of-speech-70581/ > > Just my $0.02, I am not a lawyer. > > -- manu > > -- > Manu Sporny - https://www.linkedin.com/in/manusporny/ > Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc. > https://www.digitalbazaar.com/ >
Received on Thursday, 4 May 2023 15:08:07 UTC