- From: Chaals Nevile <charles.nevile@consensys.net>
- Date: Sun, 18 Jun 2023 21:40:07 +0000
- To: Melvin Carvalho <melvincarvalho@gmail.com>, W3C Credentials Community Group <public-credentials@w3.org>, W3C DID Working Group <public-did-wg@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <1687124117993.1618675967.2493494898@consensys.net>
It would seem that your willingness to publish this list is not in fact endorsing any entry, let alone promoting them for sale. Despite noting that there is "an expectation of profit derived predominantly from the efforts of others", which sounds like a vaguely enticing thing. I suggest that the same principle generally applies to a registry, and that there is no reason not to have one because it might be misunderstood as promoting the purchase of specific securities without meeting the legal requirements for that to be a permitted activity (at least in your chosen jurisdiction). I also think this argument is eating a lot of time, and generating very little beyond a repeated assertion that publishing lists like this might be illegal, and a lot of people suggesting that makes little sense. The exception is that there were some early and IMHO very valuable suggestions to apply slightly stronger criteria for what is acceptable as a registry entry. cheers On Thursday, June 15, 2023 16:17:00 (+02:00), Melvin Carvalho wrote: I was looking for a potential list of securities, that may be used improve the did method registry, and closest I came to was this article, there may be better: https://beincrypto.com/full-list-cryptos-securities-sec-lawsuit-binance-coinbase/ criteria: an investment of money, in a common enterprise, with an expectation of profit derived predominantly from the efforts of others List: Cosmos (ATOM) Binance Coin (BNB) Binance USD (BUSD) COTI (COTI) Chiliz (CHZ) Near (NEAR) Flow (FLOW) Internet Computer (ICP) Voyager Token (VGX) Dash (DASH) Nexo (NEXO) Solana (SOL) Cardano (ADA) Polygon (MATIC) Filecoin (FIL) The Sandbox (SAND) Decentraland (MANA) Algorand (ALGO) Axie Infinity (AXS) Prominent cryptocurrencies previously declared securities by the SEC include: Ripple (XRP) Telegram’s Gram (TON) LBRY Credits (LBC) OmiseGo (OMG) DASH (DASH) Algorand (ALGO) Naga (NGC) Monolith (TKN) IHT Real Estate (IHT) Power Ledger (POWR) Kromatica (KROM) DFX Finance (DFX) Amp (AMP) Rally (RLY) Rari Governance Token (RGT) DerivaDAO (DDX) XYO Network (XYO) Liechtenstein Cryptoasset Exchange (LCX) Kin (KIN) Salt Lending (SALT) Beaxy Token (BXY) DragonChain (DRGN) Tron (TRX) BitTorrent (BTT) Terra USD (UST) Luna (LUNA) Mirror Protocol (MIR) Mango (MNGO) Ducat (DUCAT) Locke (LOCKE) EthereumMax (EMAX) Hydro (HYDRO) BitConnect (BCC) Meta 1 Coin (META1) Filecoin (FIL) Binance Coin (BNB) Binance USD (BUSD) Solana (SOL) Cardano (ADA) Polygon (MATIC) Cosmos (ATOM) The Sandbox (SAND) Decentraland (MANA) Axie Infinity (AXS) COTI (COTI) Paragon (PRG) AirToken (AIR) Chiliz (CHZ) Flow (FLOW) Internet Computer (ICP) Near (NEAR) Voyager Token (VGX) Nexo (NEXO) Mirrored Apple Inc. (mAAPL) Mirrored Amazon.com, Inc. (mAMZN) Mirrored Alibaba Group Holding Limited (mBABA) Mirrored Alphabet Inc. (mGOOGL) Mirrored Microsoft Corporation (mMSFT) Mirrored Netflix, Inc. (mNFLX) Mirrored Tesla, Inc. (mTSLA) Mirrored Twitter Inc. (mTWTR) Mirrored iShares Gold Trust (mIAU) Mirrored Invesco QQQ Trust (mQQQ) Mirrored iShares Silver Trust (mSLV) Mirrored United States Oil Fund, LP (mUSO), Mirrored ProShares VIX Short-Term Futures ETF (mVIXY) These instruments should not be promoted under the w3c banner, imho -- Charles 'Chaals' Nevile Lead Standards Architect, ConsenSys Inc
Received on Sunday, 18 June 2023 21:40:16 UTC