- From: CCG Minutes Bot <minutes@w3c-ccg.org>
- Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2023 16:35:12 +0000
Thanks to Our Robot Overlords and russell_hofvendahl_(mesur.io) for scribing this week! The transcript for the call is now available here: https://w3c-ccg.github.io/meetings/2023-06-20-traceability/ Full text of the discussion follows for W3C archival purposes. Audio of the meeting is available at the following location: https://w3c-ccg.github.io/meetings/2023-06-20-traceability/audio.ogg ---------------------------------------------------------------- Verifiable Traceability Task Force Transcript for 2023-06-20 Agenda: https://www.w3.org/Search/Mail/Public/advanced_search?hdr-1-name=subject&hdr-1-query=%5BAGENDA&period_month=Jun&period_year=2023&index-grp=Public__FULL&index-type=t&type-index=public-credentials&resultsperpage=20&sortby=date Organizer: Orie Steele, Mike Prorock, Mahmoud Alkhraishi Scribe: Our Robot Overlords and russell_hofvendahl_(mesur.io) Present: Nis Jespersen , Russell Hofvendahl, Orie Steele, Ben, TallTed // Ted Thibodeau (he/him) (OpenLinkSw.com), Chris Abernethy, Yinghui (Vivien) Fan, Ted Thibodeau, Paul Dietrich GS1 Our Robot Overlords are scribing. Russell_Hofvendahl_(mesur.io): I can do I have a few peers so that might be spotty the records there. russell_hofvendahl_(mesur.io) is scribing. Nis Jespersen : https://github.com/w3c-ccg/traceability-vocab/pulls Nis Jespersen : https://github.com/w3c-ccg/traceability-vocab/pull/813 Nis Jespersen : https://github.com/w3c-ccg/traceability-vocab/pull/814 Nis Jespersen : https://github.com/w3c-ccg/traceability-vocab/pull/815 Nis Jespersen : +1 Nis Jespersen : Trace-vocab Orie Steele: 815, Attempts to clarify reqs on trace presentations, implements simple way of,, a prez meant to replace previous presentation. Nis Jespersen : Chris, ok with that approach? Chris Abernethy: Yeah makes sense Orie Steele: Also on a bit of a clock, goal to discuss on next meeting Nis Jespersen : Agree, on issue first? Orie Steele: Helps to just open PR, share pics, describe what will do Nis Jespersen : https://github.com/w3c-ccg/traceability-vocab/pull/817 Nis Jespersen : Next 817 from me. would like approvals to merge out of band, if looks right. Orie Steele: IRIs different but can be resolved separately Nis Jespersen : https://github.com/w3c-ccg/traceability-vocab/pull/818 Nis Jespersen : Last, ben Ben: getting feedback from usmca cred. This changes order, reflect what doc loooks like originally. This does it for us exporter, importer, and made minor changes to flags Orie Steele: [...] Json schema preserves order. They don't have prop that json-ld has. yaml will maintain order, and if json-ld need order can annotate that order is important Ted Thibodeau: I'll take your word, ok Nis Jespersen : Merging Orie Steele: Suggested updates, aligns data with content Orie Steele: Want to def shape for trace presentation,m but you defined workflow file. let's sink online, later Nis Jespersen : https://github.com/w3c-ccg/traceability-interop/pulls Nis Jespersen : https://github.com/w3c-ccg/traceability-interop/pull/559 Nis Jespersen : Interop, rev2021, first 559, russell Russell Hofvendahl: This changes tutorial Orie Steele: Doesn't test multiple status lists Russell Hofvendahl: Separate PR Nis Jespersen : https://github.com/w3c-ccg/traceability-interop/pull/560 Russell Hofvendahl: Tests support both, openapi only 2021 Orie Steele: Time to get started experiencing; want to have multiple implementations passing 2021, then remove 2020 Nis Jespersen : Good, two approvals, objections? Nis Jespersen : https://github.com/w3c-ccg/traceability-interop/pull/561 Russell Hofvendahl: Changes single conformance suite postman collection file, same story Nis Jespersen : Ok, 3 approvals, merging Nis Jespersen : https://github.com/w3c-ccg/traceability-vocab/issues?q=is%3Aissue+is%3Aopen+sort%3Aupdated-asc Nis Jespersen : https://github.com/w3c-ccg/traceability-vocab/issues/567 <orie> link? Nis Jespersen : https://github.com/w3c-ccg/traceability-vocab/issues/573 Nis Jespersen : That's it on PRs, on to vocab issues Orie Steele: Still needs to be done. every time @type & points to not great, destroy value of json vocab. If don't do good job here, get bad graph data, undermines point of rdf in first place Nis Jespersen : Ben, assigned? oh, dropped, keep him assigned then Nis Jespersen : https://github.com/w3c-ccg/traceability-vocab/issues/576 Ben: back Nis Jespersen : Look at 573 make sure to Orie Steele: Applies to tooling not to repo I think Nis Jespersen : https://github.com/w3c-ccg/traceability-vocab/issues/369 Nis Jespersen : https://github.com/w3c-ccg/traceability-vocab/issues/690 Nis Jespersen : Great.Next, 369 ecommerce files, old, closing Nis Jespersen : https://github.com/w3c-ccg/traceability-vocab/issues/462 Nis Jespersen : 462, Ben, assigned to mahmoud. ben? Ben want to close this. back when we were doing more common & grouping things, what class does this refer to. We've been switching toward direct doc & using context Nis Jespersen : Inlining we've been doing, seems moot point Nis Jespersen : I'll comment but ben your ticket, you suggest we don't need this anymore? Nis Jespersen : https://github.com/w3c-ccg/traceability-vocab/issues/700 Ben: will comment Nis Jespersen : 700, Adding section on gs1 Paul: happy to do it if assigned Nis Jespersen : https://github.com/w3c-ccg/traceability-vocab/issues/701 Nis Jespersen : https://github.com/w3c-ccg/traceability-vocab/issues/702 Nis Jespersen : Thanks, great. Paul: what does this mean for gs1 creds? Nis Jespersen : Good point, similar to one before <chris_abernethy> Didn't Orie just make a PR saying that this wasn't possible? Paul: not something we do today. being gs1 like to use gdtis for doc id'fiers, not married to that just curious Nis Jespersen : Making note on issue Chris Abernethy: Wasn't orie's pr from earlier abt Nis Jespersen : https://github.com/w3c-ccg/traceability-vocab/issues/577 Nis Jespersen : https://github.com/w3c-ccg/traceability-vocab/issues/271 Nis Jespersen : https://github.com/w3c-ccg/traceability-vocab/issues/578 Nis Jespersen : Yes, can't say if breaks what you just said, but let's fix that if problem Chris Abernethy: +1 To Ted's comment Ted Thibodeau: If only ever have one or other in realworld, would do that, could in comment mention the alternate attribute and/or have two examples (i.e., one with each attribute) Ben: pointing out we have two possibilities of examples. One is in bottom combined cred, other is in yaml part. can have ex for each in yaml, with one realistic in json bottom of file. Nis Jespersen : If we were to start using, need to agree on how. One fill everything out, other to look realistic? Ben: in schema, here's descr locode, here's ex value, here's port code, here ex value. independent of each other I think. Nis Jespersen : https://github.com/w3c-ccg/traceability-vocab/issues/270 Nis Jespersen : Assigning self Chris Abernethy: I agree, orie called out second to last, but vlad don't think will. you're right we need this, don't think we can assign vlad. Nis Jespersen : https://github.com/w3c-ccg/traceability-vocab/issues/575 Yinghui (Vivien) Fan: :+1: Nis Jespersen : Making note to vladimir
Received on Monday, 24 July 2023 16:35:12 UTC