- From: Bob Wyman <bob@wyman.us>
- Date: Tue, 14 Feb 2023 06:29:48 -0500
- To: "Michael Herman (Trusted Digital Web)" <mwherman@parallelspace.net>
- Cc: "public-credentials (public-credentials@w3.org)" <public-credentials@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CAA1s49U1Ko52RYu343_q2O5vADy514yNEj-A9pmoRgDdUx-=uA@mail.gmail.com>
Michael, Given https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-mediaman-suffixes, it seems to me that: > application/credential+ld+json would be more "obvious" than > application/ld-credential+json What am I missing? bob wyman On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 2:33 PM Michael Herman (Trusted Digital Web) < mwherman@parallelspace.net> wrote: > Thank you Orie, Daniel, Dave, and Manu for your quick responses – and that > everyone had the same answer 😊 > > > > RE: - https://www.iana.org/assignments/media-types/application/ld+json > > RE: Type name: application > > RE: Subtype name: ld+json > > > > Using the above as a pattern, isn’t the most obvious Media Type for a > JSON-LD Verifiable Credential (encoded as JSON) something like: > > > > RE: Type name: application > > RE: Subtype name: ld-credential+json > > > > That is, the Subtype name correlates with a particular object model (e.g. > JSON-LD VC DM) with the suffix correlating with the parseable “file type” > (e.g, +json). > > > > Michael > > CAD 2 cents – even though we don’t have pennies any more > > > Get Outlook for Android <https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg> > ------------------------------ > *From:* Dave Longley <dlongley@digitalbazaar.com> > *Sent:* Monday, February 13, 2023 12:08:37 PM > *To:* Orie Steele <orie@transmute.industries> > *Cc:* Michael Herman (Trusted Digital Web) <mwherman@parallelspace.net>; > public-credentials (public-credentials@w3.org) <public-credentials@w3.org> > *Subject:* Re: Naive (short) question about JSON-LD parsing > > Short answer: Yes, all JSON-LD is JSON and thus parsable by any "plain > old" JSON parser. > > Also (inline below)... > > On Mon, Feb 13, 2023 at 12:10 PM Orie Steele <orie@transmute.industries> > wrote: > > See also: > > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-w3cdidwg-media-types-with-multiple-suffixes#section-2.1 > > ^ Note the draft for multiple suffixes appears not adopted by an IETF WG > and is also expired... Happy to assist in correcting that. > > > That's not the most up to date draft, which I believe is here: > https://www.ietf.org/archive/id/draft-ietf-mediaman-suffixes-03.html > > -- > > Dave Longley > CTO > Digital Bazaar, Inc. > >
Received on Tuesday, 14 February 2023 11:30:13 UTC