Re: Layering/Composability of Verifiable Credentials (was: Re: Market Adoption of VCs by Fortune 500s (was: Re: DHS Verifier Confidence/Assurance Level Expectation/Treatment of non-publicly defined Vocabulary/Terminology -- by using @vocab))

In couple of weeks, I will Host a mathematician who should know how how to
think about the various layers of a verifiable credential. I will follow up
later.

On Tuesday, February 7, 2023, Michael Herman (Trusted Digital Web) <
mwherman@parallelspace.net> wrote:

> Kim, as promised, here is a link to the latest version of the
> InterCredential ARM tutorial…
>
>
>
> *Internet Credential (InterCredential) Architecture Reference Model 0.67*
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PHz5IrbvTsY&list=PLU-
> rWqHm5p44AsU5GLsc1bHC7P8zolAAf&index=5
>
>
>
> This tutorial elaborates on several topics:
>
>    - 4 InterCredential examples slide added (slide 32)
>    - 4-Corner InterCredential Interoperability Model (Intercredential-4C)
>    (slide 33)
>    - DIDComm Agent Logical Composition (slide 45)
>    - Internet Credential Composition Model (InterCredential Software
>    Pipeline) (slide 54)
>
>
>
> Best regards,
>
> Michael Herman
>
> Web 7.0
>
>
>
> *From:* Michael Herman (Trusted Digital Web) <mwherman@parallelspace.net>
> *Sent:* Sunday, February 5, 2023 3:19 PM
> *To:* Kim Hamilton <kimdhamilton@gmail.com>
> *Cc:* Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>; public-credentials@w3.org;
> Christopher Allen <ChristopherA@lifewithalacrity.com>; Daniel Hardman (
> daniel.hardman@gmail.com) <daniel.hardman@gmail.com>; G. Ken Holman (
> g.ken.holman@gmail.com) <g.ken.holman@gmail.com>
> *Subject:* Re: Layering/Composability of Verifiable Credentials (was: Re:
> Market Adoption of VCs by Fortune 500s (was: Re: DHS Verifier
> Confidence/Assurance Level Expectation/Treatment of non-publicly defined
> Vocabulary/Terminology -- by using @vocab))
>
>
>
> This following is the best resource available today...
>
>
>
> Internet Credential (InterCredential) Architecture Reference Model 0.65
>
> https://youtu.be/A8VzFwbDTLM
>
>
>
> Version 0.66 will include a detailed application of DIDComm Agent logical
> composition to the 4-Corner Credential Interoperability Model. Likely
> available tomorrow.
>
> (I'm inbound from Merida to Houston to Calgary to NYC over the next 24
> hours.)
>
>
>
> The spec text is a work-in-progress.
>
>
>
> Get Outlook for Android <https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>
> ------------------------------
>
> *From:* Kim Hamilton <kimdhamilton@gmail.com>
> *Sent:* Sunday, February 5, 2023 1:11:54 PM
> *To:* Michael Herman (Trusted Digital Web) <mwherman@parallelspace.net>
> *Cc:* Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>; public-credentials@w3.org <
> public-credentials@w3.org>; Christopher Allen <ChristopherA@
> lifewithalacrity.com>; Daniel Hardman (daniel.hardman@gmail.com) <
> daniel.hardman@gmail.com>; G. Ken Holman (g.ken.holman@gmail.com) <
> g.ken.holman@gmail.com>
> *Subject:* Re: Layering/Composability of Verifiable Credentials (was: Re:
> Market Adoption of VCs by Fortune 500s (was: Re: DHS Verifier
> Confidence/Assurance Level Expectation/Treatment of non-publicly defined
> Vocabulary/Terminology -- by using @vocab))
>
>
>
> I searched for InterCredential spec but couldn't find it. I found this web
> 7.0 reference but it's not clear it's what you're talking about:
> https://dl.acm.org/doi/fullHtml/10.1145/3184558.3190666
>
>
>
> Pointers to specs please?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On Sun, Feb 5, 2023 at 10:56 AM Michael Herman (Trusted Digital Web) <
> mwherman@parallelspace.net> wrote:
>
> Rather than engage in endless debate, it's easier/more expedient to
> embrace, by reference, the W3C VC2 specification as a sub-specification of
> the InterCredential spec ...an embrace-and-extend model ...and let the
> decentralized systems developer marketplace decide.
>
>
>
> After the inclusion of the 4-Corner Credential Interoperability Model into
> the InterCredential ARM, the W3C VC2 spec becomes a niche
> layer/specification.  See the green box in the diagram below.
>
>
>
> Michael Herman
>
> Web 7.0
>
>
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
> Sent: Sunday, February 5, 2023 11:46 AM
> To: public-credentials@w3.org
> Subject: Re: Layering/Composability of Verifiable Credentials (was: Re:
> Market Adoption of VCs by Fortune 500s (was: Re: DHS Verifier
> Confidence/Assurance Level Expectation/Treatment of non-publicly defined
> Vocabulary/Terminology -- by using @vocab))
>
>
>
> On Fri, Feb 3, 2023 at 4:58 PM Nate Otto <nate@ottonomy.net> wrote:
>
> > Cheers! I hope you have a good time in the community people here have
> spent the last decade building, and I hope you find great collaborators for
> the pieces of credentials-related work you want to contribute to.
>
>
>
> Thank you, Nate -- that was wonderfully written! I found myself nodding in
> agreement as I read through your response.
>
>
>
> Michael, does Nate get it? He seems to have addressed all of your
> questions/statements?
>
>
>
> -- manu
>
>
>
> --
>
> Manu Sporny - https://www.linkedin.com/in/manusporny/
>
> Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
>
> News: Digital Bazaar Announces New Case Studies (2021)
> https://www.digitalbazaar.com/
>
>
>
>

-- 
-Brent Shambaugh

GitHub: https://github.com/bshambaugh
Website: http://bshambaugh.org/
LinkedIN: https://www.linkedin.com/in/brent-shambaugh-9b91259
Skype: brent.shambaugh
Twitter: https://twitter.com/Brent_Shambaugh
WebID: http://bshambaugh.org/foaf.rdf#me