Re: Question regarding DID method-specific-id

Hello Stefannie,


 From that documentation page I can't really tell what a "CordaX500Name" 
looks like when expressed as a single string, do you have an example?


But basically a method-specific-id can be anything that matches this 
ABNF pattern:


method-specific-id = *( *idchar ":" ) 1*idchar
idchar             = ALPHA / DIGIT / "." / "-" / "_" / pct-encoded


So it can consist of letters, digits, and the . - _ characters as well 
as percent-encoding such as %20


You say the name is base encoded and then percent-encoded, but from a 
DID syntax perspective, this feels unnecessary.


If the "CordaX500Name" can be expressed using only characters from the 
list above, then there may be no need to base- or percent-encode 
anything, and readability can be preserved.


Markus


On 8/29/23 09:33, ステファニー タン（SBIホールディングス） wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I am seeking community support/advice regarding DID method-specific-id 
> in the syntax. If the DID Name is a CordaX500Name 
> (https://docs.r3.com/en/api-ref/corda/4.8/open-source/javadoc/net/corda/core/identity/CordaX500Name.html 
> <https://docs.r3.com/en/api-ref/corda/4.8/open-source/javadoc/net/corda/core/identity/CordaX500Name.html>) 
> that has been base encoded, and then percent-encoded:
>
>  1. will there be any potential issues if we use the above method?
>     (technically speaking, is it possible?)
>  2. is there a way to preserve readability?
>
>
> Thank you!
>
> Stefannie
>
>
>