- From: W3C Webmaster via GitHub API <sysbot+gh@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 17:01:49 +0000
- To: public-credentials@w3.org
- Message-Id: <E1on0ph-009xBA-AP@uranus.w3.org>
Issues
------
* w3c/vc-data-model (+3/-5/💬140)
3 issues created:
- In support of adding `@vocab` to `/credentials/v2` (by OR13)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/953
- Proposal: digestMultibase - Chaining VCs via links and digests (by dmitrizagidulin)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/952
- About the optionality of the "kid" field in JWT-formatted VCs/VPs (by vdods)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/951
27 issues received 140 new comments:
- #953 Add `@vocab` for `private claims` in `/credentials/v2` `@context` (39 by David-Chadwick, OR13, TallTed, bumblefudge, decentralgabe, dlongley, dmitrizagidulin, gkellogg, melvincarvalho, mfosterio, mkhraisha, mprorock, msporny, nadalin, peacekeeper, selfissued, tplooker, vongohren)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/953
- #951 About the optionality of the "kid" field in JWT-formatted VCs/VPs (2 by David-Chadwick, vdods)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/951
- #948 Limit JSON-LD optionality to enhance developer experience (12 by David-Chadwick, OR13, dlongley, gvelez17, iherman, msporny, nadalin, selfissued, vongohren)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/948
- #947 Make the usage of `@context` optional (51 by David-Chadwick, OR13, dhh1128, dlongley, iherman, lrosenthol, melvincarvalho, mprorock, msporny, nadalin, peacekeeper, selfissued, stenreijers, talltree)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/947 [discuss]
- #944 Change the target file for "https://www.w3.org/2018/credentials/" (at some point...) (1 by msporny)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/944
- #940 EU Label joint degree and multiple issuers for the same VC (2 by RieksJ, paulojorgeqferreira)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/940
- #934 Define JSON Schemas for all objects in the VCDM (1 by jan-forster-cognizone)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/934 [discuss]
- #929 Tracking Issue from TPAC: What does JSON-LD compatible JSON mean? (4 by David-Chadwick, msporny, nadalin)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/929 [discuss]
- #928 Presentation hook (1 by msporny)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/928
- #925 Minor edit: correction to out of sync link titles in section 4.3 to JSON-LD spec (1 by msporny)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/925
- #912 Add normative reference to Data Integrity (1 by msporny)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/912 [editorial]
- #901 Add DataIntegritySignature to v2 context? (1 by msporny)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/901
- #895 ACDC (Authentic Chained Data Containers) in VC DM 2.0 (2 by brentzundel, mark-moir)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/895 [discuss]
- #862 [Tracking Issue - Proposed Corrections Feedback] URL to URI (2 by iherman, msporny)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/862 [ready for PR]
- #843 Remove `@version` from v2 context (1 by msporny)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/843
- #839 PresentationSchema for VPs (1 by iherman)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/839 [discuss]
- #831 Proposal: Anchored Resources and Hashlinks for VCs (1 by dmitrizagidulin)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/831 [discuss]
- #779 Is a verifiable credential in JSON-LD expand form valid? (1 by msporny)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/779
- #778 Base context v1 missing `sec:` mapping in RsaSignature2018 "@context" (1 by msporny)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/778
- #764 URI dereferencing (1 by msporny)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/764
- #762 Can a credentialSubject be only a string value? (4 by OR13, iherman, kdenhartog, msporny)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/762 [ready for PR]
- #758 Fix the vc-data-model namespace with https://www.w3.org/ns/vc/v2 (1 by msporny)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/758 [discuss]
- #756 credentials/v2 should allow additional proof purposes (2 by OR13, msporny)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/756 [pending close]
- #753 Default vocab for credentials context v2 (1 by msporny)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/753
- #731 `notTransferable` property not defined in `@context` (2 by David-Chadwick, msporny)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/731 [pending close]
- #709 Implementation Issues and under specification (3 by iherman, msporny, nadalin)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/709 [discuss]
- #248 Add a summary text as meta information (1 by msporny)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/248
5 issues closed:
- credentials/v2 should allow additional proof purposes https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/756 [pending close]
- Default vocab for credentials context v2 https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/753
- Add a summary text as meta information https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/248
- Remove `@version` from v2 context https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/843
- About the optionality of the "kid" field in JWT-formatted VCs/VPs https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/issues/951
* w3c/vc-data-integrity (+1/-0/💬1)
1 issues created:
- Cleanly separate cryptosuite verification and purpose verification algorithms (by msporny)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-integrity/issues/66
1 issues received 1 new comments:
- #66 Cleanly separate cryptosuite verification and purpose verification algorithms (1 by TallTed)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-integrity/issues/66
* w3c/vc-jwt (+3/-4/💬14)
3 issues created:
- Should we comment on "principle"? (by OR13)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-jwt/issues/35
- Add Privacy and Security Considerations (by OR13)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-jwt/issues/34
- About the optionality of the "kid" field in JWT-formatted VCs/VPs (by vdods)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-jwt/issues/31
10 issues received 14 new comments:
- #31 About the optionality of the "kid" field in JWT-formatted VCs/VPs (1 by selfissued)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-jwt/issues/31
- #30 Accept or Dismiss the guidance provided by DIF on `kid` / `iss` (3 by OR13, Sakurann, selfissued)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-jwt/issues/30
- #27 Respec warnings and errors (1 by selfissued)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-jwt/issues/27
- #23 Confusing text about "If no JWS is present" (1 by selfissued)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-jwt/issues/23
- #22 Clarify relationship between "iss" and "issuer" (2 by TallTed, selfissued)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-jwt/issues/22
- #18 Delete "still" in description of JWT (1 by selfissued)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-jwt/issues/18
- #17 Write meaningful Abstract (1 by selfissued)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-jwt/issues/17
- #16 Adopt a more meaningful VC-JWT specification title (1 by selfissued)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-jwt/issues/16
- #8 [JWT encoding] JWT claim names `instead of` or `in addition to` their verifiable credential counterparts (1 by selfissued)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-jwt/issues/8
- #6 Support for multiple signatures (2 by David-Chadwick, selfissued)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-jwt/issues/6 [discuss]
4 issues closed:
- Write meaningful Introduction https://github.com/w3c/vc-jwt/issues/21
- Delete "still" in description of JWT https://github.com/w3c/vc-jwt/issues/18
- Write meaningful Abstract https://github.com/w3c/vc-jwt/issues/17
- Adopt a more meaningful VC-JWT specification title https://github.com/w3c/vc-jwt/issues/16
Pull requests
-------------
* w3c/vc-data-model (+1/-1/💬4)
1 pull requests submitted:
- Switched to YAML for the vocab definition (by iherman)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/pull/954
1 pull requests received 4 new comments:
- #943 Add DataIntegrityProof to credentials/v2 JSON-LD Context. (4 by iherman, msporny)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/pull/943
1 pull requests merged:
- Add DataIntegrityProof to credentials/v2 JSON-LD Context.
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model/pull/943
* w3c/vc-data-integrity (+1/-3/💬18)
1 pull requests submitted:
- Create a First Public Working Draft for Data Integrity. (by msporny)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-integrity/pull/67
4 pull requests received 18 new comments:
- #67 Create a First Public Working Draft for Data Integrity. (2 by iherman, msporny)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-integrity/pull/67
- #65 Create formal version of the security vocabulary (9 by OR13, iherman, msporny)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-integrity/pull/65
- #64 Update algorithm for Verify Proof (4 by iherman, msporny)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-integrity/pull/64
- #63 Remove the unnecessary Create Verify Hash Algorithm. (3 by iherman, msporny)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-integrity/pull/63
3 pull requests merged:
- Create formal version of the security vocabulary
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-integrity/pull/65
- Update algorithm for Verify Proof
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-integrity/pull/64
- Remove the unnecessary Create Verify Hash Algorithm.
https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-integrity/pull/63
* w3c/vc-jws-2020 (+0/-0/💬3)
1 pull requests received 3 new comments:
- #24 Add IANA to context (3 by dlongley, iherman, msporny)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-jws-2020/pull/24
* w3c/vc-jwt (+2/-1/💬2)
2 pull requests submitted:
- Multiple subjects note (by selfissued)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-jwt/pull/33
- Excise vacuous introduction (by selfissued)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-jwt/pull/32
1 pull requests received 2 new comments:
- #11 Begin production rule definition (2 by OR13, iherman)
https://github.com/w3c/vc-jwt/pull/11
1 pull requests merged:
- Excise vacuous introduction
https://github.com/w3c/vc-jwt/pull/32
Repositories tracked by this digest:
-----------------------------------
* https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-model
* https://github.com/w3c/vc-test-suite
* https://github.com/w3c/vc-imp-guide
* https://github.com/w3c/vc-use-cases
* https://github.com/w3c/vc-wg-charter
* https://github.com/w3c/vc-data-integrity
* https://github.com/w3c/vc-jws-2020
* https://github.com/w3c/vc-jwt
--
Sent via github-notify-ml as configured in https://github.com/w3c/github-notify-ml-config
Received on Monday, 24 October 2022 17:01:51 UTC