Re: Centralization dangers of applying OpenID Connect to wallets protocols (was: Re: 2022-2026 Verifiable Data Standards Roadmap [DRAFT])

>Out of CHAPI, DIDCommv2, and OpenID... OpenID is the most centralizing, worst
solution for Verifiable Credential Exchange on the table today.

Manu, you obviously don’t understand the difference between OpenID  Connect core and SIOP to make a statement like that. It seems that this is just a thread trying to bash OpenID without understanding. 

Not sure where to begin here as there are so many responses that are all over the place.

Need to separate OIDC and SIOP and discuss how SIOP supports a 3 party model and decentralization.

There is no worst solution, this is all use case driven, it seems you are trying to dictate what protocols developers should use without understanding what their needs are, just a blanket statement. You seem to base your comments on a specific decentralized usecase but don’t want to hear about other usecases.

So please explain why you believe SIOP V2 is centralized ? Why is SIOP  the “worst” solution ? David W.  has asked tis many times without a proper response I have noticed.


Sent from Mail for Windows