Re: did:key DID Document generation algorithm feedback

Could I sit in on a WG meeting on this topic?

I am behind:
https://www.npmjs.com/package/did-key-creator
https://www.npmjs.com/package/key-did-resolver
and some updates to decentralized-identity/did-jwt

I'll look more at the PR, but maybe hearing you talk would spark an idea
and lead to improvement. (in my copious time :P)

-Brent Shambaugh

GitHub: https://github.com/bshambaugh
Website: http://bshambaugh.org/
LinkedIN: https://www.linkedin.com/in/brent-shambaugh-9b91259
Skype: brent.shambaugh
Twitter: https://twitter.com/Brent_Shambaugh
WebID: http://bshambaugh.org/foaf.rdf#me


On Mon, Jun 13, 2022 at 11:26 PM Manu Sporny <msporny@digitalbazaar.com>
wrote:

> The DID Document generation algorithm for did:key is being refined to the
> point that we can finish off a first pass of a did:key test suite.
>
> There is active discussion going on in the current PR, the first of several
> PRs, for those interested in reviewing the algorithms as they progress:
>
> https://github.com/w3c-ccg/did-method-key/pull/51
>
> There are still some things that will need to be defined by the VC2WG to
> finish off the did:key method and there are issue markers that have been
> added
> to the spec to note some of those things (like the specification of the
> Multikey format).
>
> This is just a heads-up to the CCG since this is a significant upgrade to
> the
> current did:key spec.
>
> -- manu
>
> --
> Manu Sporny - https://www.linkedin.com/in/manusporny/
> Founder/CEO - Digital Bazaar, Inc.
> News: Digital Bazaar Announces New Case Studies (2021)
> https://www.digitalbazaar.com/
>
>
>