Re: Phil Windley, Biometrics, and Digital Identities

Chris Buchanan on p193 of  Proceedings of the 31st Internet Identity
Workshop
<https://github.com/windley/IIW_homepage/raw/gh-pages/assets/proceedings/IIW_31_Book_of_Proceedings_1.pdf>.
Transcribed as:

Digital Identity is Not Equivalent to Physical Identity.

Transience

   -

   Most physical identity transactions are transient and quickly forgotten.
   -

   The internet never forgets.


Retransmission

   -

   The physical world is severely limited in its ability to transmit and
   consume data and must therefore be selective.
   -

   The internet’s entire purpose is efficient retransmission of data.


Degradation

   -

   Physical world data degrades in both quantity and quality over time and
   when it is retransmitted.
   -

   Digital information is perfectly preserved in storage and retransmission.


© 2020 THE MITRE CORPORATION. APPROVED FOR PUBLIC RELEASE. DISTRIBUTION
UNLIMITED 20-00971

On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 10:09 AM Kaliya Identity Woman <
kaliya@identitywoman.net> wrote:

>
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On Jan 28, 2022, at 6:17 AM, Adrian Gropper <agropper@healthurl.com>
> wrote:
>
> 
> Solving deduplication for voting or tax fraud requires biometrics.
>
> Right now, the biometrics are proprietary (the databases are not open,
> they are in the hands of government or private corporations) and
> non-standard (the templates and the encoding of attributes and service
> endpoints are proprietary as well.
>
> Standardized digital credentials make the problem worse.
>
>
> 1) what is “the problem”?
>
> 2) why does it become worse?
>
>
>
>
>
> Adrian
>
> On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 7:54 AM Michael Herman (Trusted Digital Web) <
> mwherman@parallelspace.net> wrote:
>
>> Checkout
>>
>> http://news.windley.com/issues/a-defacto-national-id-from-id-me-technometria-issue-39-997993
>>
>> Michael Herman
>>
>> Get Outlook for Android <https://aka.ms/AAb9ysg>
>>
>

Received on Friday, 28 January 2022 15:37:43 UTC