W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > public-credentials@w3.org > February 2022

DIF VC-JWTs look like Linked Data Proof Verifiable Credentials

From: Orie Steele <orie@transmute.industries>
Date: Thu, 24 Feb 2022 08:08:19 -0600
Message-ID: <CAN8C-_+TKpi7y9M6mJqXAZD2eSf30BztySJLSw32hJJbKiit8g@mail.gmail.com>
To: "W3C Credentials CG (Public List)" <public-credentials@w3.org>, David Waite <dwaite@pingidentity.com>, David Chadwick <d.w.chadwick@verifiablecredentials.info>, Mike Jones <Michael.Jones@microsoft.com>
Hey Folks,

As we gear up for VCDM2.0 there are a number of VC-JWT implementations that
we are tracking and attempting to show interoperability across.

One of the oldest VC-JWT implementations is hosted at DIF, but it produces
VC-JWTs that are not compact JWTs ... they look more like Linked Data Proof
VCs.

As far as I know, no other VC-JWT implementation supports this format, aka
"JwtProof2020".

Here is a link to an issue with an example:
https://github.com/centrehq/verite/issues/373#issuecomment-1049888568

If you have a few minutes, I would love some review of what the DIF
implementation is doing, and how we can either push it all the way into the
LD Proof camp, or all the way into the VC-JWT camp.

Regards,

OS

-- 
*ORIE STEELE*
Chief Technical Officer
www.transmute.industries

<https://www.transmute.industries>
ᐧ
Received on Thursday, 24 February 2022 14:09:43 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Thursday, 24 March 2022 20:25:29 UTC