- From: Harrison <harrison@spokeo.com>
- Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2022 11:29:47 -0800
- To: Juan Caballero <caballerojuan@pm.me>
- Cc: public-credentials@w3.org
- Message-ID: <CAFYh=40eQZQxhPnDoep5vrTZ4Sa6nT7tpXRBBVDMROJ4tv=BOQ@mail.gmail.com>
Please feel free to ask these questions at our regular Tuesday meetings. In addition, we've invited the Google FedCM team to present at W3C CCG on *Tuesday 1/24/2023*. Here is a list of the upcoming discussions: https://www.w3.org/groups/cg/credentials/calendar. Sincerely, Harrison On Sun, Dec 11, 2022 at 7:11 PM Juan Caballero <caballerojuan@pm.me> wrote: > Can we put this very issue on the agenda? I'm a little confused myself so > if there's time in Q&A I'd love an ELI5 on different ways/points in the > flow diff kinds of hardware crypto might work, in present or future > versions! > > Thanks, > __juan > On 11/27/2022 3:23 PM, Manu Sporny wrote: > > On Sun, Nov 27, 2022 at 6:04 PM ANTHONY NADALIN <nadalin@prodigy.net> <nadalin@prodigy.net> wrote: > > Doesn't allow hardware crypto support unless the browsers enable it by implementing CHAPI as far as I'm aware > > The Credential Handler API is about registering applications and > routing messages to and from the appropriate applications. CHAPI isn't > a hardware cryptography API. > > If what you mean is that you need a first party context to run > hardware crypto, then CHAPI can run in first party mode. Another > expectation with the FedCM interface is that you would be able to > utilize hardware crypto. What am I missing here, sounds like we're > either comparing apples with oranges or that there is a > misunderstanding about how CHAPI works. > > -- manu > > > -- > ------------ > Juan Caballero, PhD. > Personal/Freelance account, opinions are not my employers', etc. > PST/CET; Self-schedule through cal.com <https://cal.com/bumblefudge> >
Received on Monday, 12 December 2022 19:30:17 UTC