Re: Status of w3c-ccg/rdf-dataset-canonicalization repo


On 04/12/2022 12:26, Phil Archer wrote:
> Agreed, thanks for bringing this up, Gregg.
>
> @PA - this is something we'll need your help with I think.

I'm affraid I can't be of much help here, because the CCG has its own 
github organization, on which I have no privilege. It would need someone 
from the CCG, whith enough permissions, to freeze the repo.

As for transfering the issues, I read here 
<https://docs.github.com/en/issues/tracking-your-work-with-issues/transferring-an-issue-to-another-repository> 
that

 > You can only transfer issues between repositories owned by the same 
user or organization account

so transferring the issues will have to be done manually...

   pa

>
> It's not just about having to keep an eye on multiple issue trackers, it's about the intellectual property now that the spec is on Rec track, so it's important that, yes, the CCG repo is archived and people interested focus on the WG's repo.
>
> Phil
>
>
>
> Phil Archer
> Web Solutions Director, GS1
> https://www.gs1.org

>
> Meet GS1 Digital Link Developers at
> https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/gs1-digital-link-developers

>
> https://philarcher.org

> +44 (0)7887 767755
> @philarcher1
> Skype: philarcher
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gregg Kellogg<gregg@greggkellogg.net>
> Sent: 02 December 2022 23:46
> To: W3C Credentials CG<public-credentials@w3.org>
> Cc: RDF Dataset Canonicalization and Hash (RCH) WG<public-rch-wg@w3.org>
> Subject: Status of w3c-ccg/rdf-dataset-canonicalization repo
>
> Issues are coming in, which should go to the WG repo. Also, issues in the CCG repo should probably be moved to, or merged with those in the WG. When this is done, I think locking down that repo to prevent further changes, and more explicitly redirect people to the RCH repo would save everyone a lot of time going forward.
>
> Gregg Kellogg
> gregg@greggkellogg.net
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY / DISCLAIMER: The contents of this e-mail are  confidential and are not to be regarded as a contractual offer or acceptance from GS1 (registered in Belgium).
> If you are not the addressee, or if this has been copied or sent to you in error, you must not use data herein for any purpose, you must delete it, and should inform the sender.
> GS1 disclaims liability for accuracy or completeness, and opinions expressed are those of the author alone.
> GS1 may monitor communications.
> Third party rights acknowledged.
> (c) 2020.

Received on Sunday, 4 December 2022 22:50:58 UTC